From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80469C6379F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 19:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229499AbjAMTqS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:46:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229527AbjAMTpt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:45:49 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20657149EC for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id k11so2756929qth.3 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:45:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nKGPCf/WnxdeLrYkK1h+ppHtGH89vAKEcp2AHfVnqm4=; b=n2gpmqnoZpxhC3drOnKm7dGJnMc+A5U1oEyYzBn7a1CVOiYw71+v2fp7iRd8sYB3IT gl0cyILRJ1N5OLYiuVxE/GR20AFXznJH3mPXp9/Q6/jZhtv6xQwpGkpupOoocprdfumb 5HTc6oYRrawLHVhRVtDT6C6SdwGcYU4FZro0UTJBt+/jX6LA7Bq3rKGCYn0fnVeA+NfH wfGVYwod2iwcU4p9MbM/LBJPOe2hB4QK7OQQGQ2n7y4AzbdXgl3hqQidYze7ArRo0FKs O0lb0Jg04iN/ie1kC/tTTOpt9elPhN/uV41htq2/HBT1oeqzpZJ7JBYhTbCUxe0TrNJk hg2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nKGPCf/WnxdeLrYkK1h+ppHtGH89vAKEcp2AHfVnqm4=; b=gxNtJMpHGNtRq9XpNSQcqQ2F9vUZKjP0jYJbxMKVppcrQDNOrTVu+E2jciC565+qas 6NXyVR6Dy4mwUkFJZQzrBpJvJZxEAg0OIwzUdHQZ/cl0kl9YoxZwpWLua0zuagxwnVm3 rMKe1GwArKmrj09Zm8wH7qixze2SQ7EeZx+/vaTQrTLrAC5b9AeRlKCmXHrfvYonfBI1 z7VOZGSJaLdCLBrgca+dZg7YkfMCy7R6HTs5rD2+cZh9XkfCEEyk/P1gmy9C5Z+TsaEA h0Zv3/aXbzN5twNiN9nieYeOwcKxUWM03u5pBOp3vdTQqJrcnqitxml9PxlpMO2rlEdr oWZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kp5bKH8WO3Ff3FAq7sY9cyaqI28iH/6C4theKEqwdqvzxW7K9b6 jBBgaOOuJ3g5y3w3zqlE+pykPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvfh9K8c6l/h2CIEbjJU3hrWPX5b/ImJDym2kleyYB+2ny0W2SD5wzPbNH4mDp/UDDlMcqwcQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1382:0:b0:3a8:1793:76d6 with SMTP id h2-20020ac81382000000b003a8179376d6mr108960695qtj.68.1673639147243; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:45:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-68-50-193.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.68.50.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10-20020a05620a284a00b006feea093006sm13223828qkp.124.2023.01.13.11.45.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by wakko with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pGPzm-00AghL-3u; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:45:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:45:46 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Lu Baolu , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Vasant Hegde , Chunyan Zhang , Sven Peter , iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Remove ipmmu_utlb_disable() Message-ID: References: <20230113185640.8050-1-joro@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 08:25:17PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:12:21PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > I'm surprised the 0-day bot didn't notice? > > Well, I think 0-day does not spend that much time on iommu patch-sets, > especially doing randconfigs or allyes/modconfigs. Intel folks, can you check on this with the 0-day team? Perhaps since the list was moved it is not properly subscribed. > In general it is a good idea to at least compile-test every file that is > changed in a patch-set before sending it out and not rely on 0-day bot > for that. Against every arch combination? This is why we have automation bots :( Jason