From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: kdump kernel randomly hang with tick_periodic call trace on bare metal system
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 10:08:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8IOtY2x8XQT+Owd@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mt6rjrra.ffs@tglx>
On 01/09/23 at 10:57pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20 2022 at 13:41, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On one intel bare metal system, I can randomly reproduce the kdump hang
> > as below with tick_periodic call trace. Attach the kernel config for
> > reference.
>
> This has absolutely nothing to do with x2apic IPI shorthands
>
> > [ 0.045980] Spurious LAPIC timer interrupt on cpu 0
>
> So here the CPU receives a spurious Local APIC timer interrupt, but
> that's a red herring.
>
> > [ 1.152690] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088
> > [ 1.159634] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > [ 1.164757] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > [ 1.169882] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > [ 1.172407] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> > [ 1.176578] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.11-300.fc37.x86_64 #1
> > [ 1.183870] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R410/0N051F, BIOS 1.11.0 07/20/2012
> > [ 1.191420] RIP: 0010:tick_periodic+0x23/0x80
>
> I'm willing to bet that this is caused by the following line in tick_periodic():
>
> update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
>
> user_mode() is invoked with a NULL pointer. user_mode() accesses
> regs->cs. CS is at offset 0x88....
>
> The reason for this is here:
>
> > [ 1.280648] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x70
> > [ 1.284821] timer_interrupt+0x14/0x20
> > [ 1.288561] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x46/0x190
> > [ 1.293253] handle_irq_event+0x34/0x70
> > [ 1.297080] handle_level_irq+0xa8/0x180
> > [ 1.300993] resend_irqs+0x5d/0x70
> > [ 1.304386] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xab/0xe0
> > [ 1.309686] __do_softirq+0xfb/0x319
> > [ 1.313254] __irq_exit_rcu+0xd7/0x140
> > [ 1.316993] common_interrupt+0xb9/0xd0
>
> For some reason the timer interrupt is resent in software. I assume it is
> the HPET interrupt because that's what just got initialized.
>
> > [ 1.143537] clocksource: hpet: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 133484882848 ns
>
> and the callchain below just confirms that:
>
> > [ 1.393315] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x19/0x40
> > [ 1.398093] __setup_irq+0x443/0x6d0
> > [ 1.401659] request_threaded_irq+0x109/0x170
> > [ 1.406005] hpet_time_init+0x2d/0x4b
> > [ 1.409661] x86_late_time_init+0x17/0x34
> > [ 1.413658] start_kernel+0x8cf/0x97f
>
> The software resend code does not go through the regular interrupt entry
> path which explains why get_irq_regs() returns NULL.
>
> That software resend is bogus especially since the timer interrupt is
> a level interrupt. As dmesg does not say anything about the APIC
> delivery mode I assume this goes through i8259, which fails to set the
> IRQ_LEVEL flag on all interrupt lines.
>
> The below should fix this.
Sorry for late reply, just notice this mail.
Thanks a lot for checking this and providing a fix, I will reserve the
lab machine and give it a shot, will feedback once finished.
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void make_8259A_irq(unsigned int
> disable_irq_nosync(irq);
> io_apic_irqs &= ~(1<<irq);
> irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &i8259A_chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_LEVEL);
> enable_irq(irq);
> lapic_assign_legacy_vector(irq, true);
> }
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,10 @@ void __init init_ISA_irqs(void)
>
> legacy_pic->init(0);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_legacy_irqs(); i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_legacy_irqs(); i++) {
> irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_set_status_flags(i, IRQ_LEVEL);
> + }
> }
>
> void __init init_IRQ(void)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-14 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-20 5:34 [PATCH] Revert "x86/apic/x2apic: Implement IPI shorthands support" Baoquan He
2022-12-20 5:41 ` kdump kernel randomly hang with tick_periodic call trace on bare metal system Baoquan He
2022-12-20 5:51 ` Baoquan He
2022-12-21 15:46 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2022-12-22 4:09 ` Baoquan He
2023-01-09 21:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-01-14 2:08 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-01-16 9:08 ` Baoquan He
2023-01-16 16:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/i8259: Mark legacy PIC interrupts with IRQ_LEVEL tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-20 11:38 ` [PATCH] Revert "x86/apic/x2apic: Implement IPI shorthands support" Peter Zijlstra
2022-12-20 12:38 ` Baoquan He
2023-01-04 15:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-09 21:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-01-10 2:24 ` Baoquan He
2023-01-17 8:27 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8IOtY2x8XQT+Owd@fedora \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox