From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Move the LFENCE_RDTSC / LFENCE always serializing feature
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 19:13:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8WTnx/ukvdAEeoe@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230110224643.452273-5-kim.phillips@amd.com>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 04:46:39PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> The LFENCE_RDTSC / LFENCE always serializing feature was a scattered bit
> and open-coded for KVM in __do_cpuid_func(). Add it to its newly added
> CPUID leaf 0x80000021 EAX proper, and propagate it in kvm_set_cpu_caps()
> instead.
>
> Also drop the bit description comments now it's more self-describing.
>
> Whilst there, switch to using the more efficient cpu_feature_enabled()
> instead of static_cpu_has().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 9 ++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 0cd7b4afd528..79da8e492c0f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32 ( 3*32+15) /* "" sysenter in IA32 userspace */
> #define X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD ( 3*32+16) /* REP microcode works well */
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_LBR_V2 ( 3*32+17) /* AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 */
> -#define X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC ( 3*32+18) /* "" LFENCE synchronizes RDTSC */
> +/* FREE, was #define X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC ( 3*32+18) "" LFENCE synchronizes RDTSC */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ACC_POWER ( 3*32+19) /* AMD Accumulated Power Mechanism */
> #define X86_FEATURE_NOPL ( 3*32+20) /* The NOPL (0F 1F) instructions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS ( 3*32+21) /* "" Always-present feature */
> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@
>
> /* AMD-defined Extended Feature 2 EAX, CPUID level 0x80000021 (EAX), word 20 */
> #define X86_FEATURE_NO_NESTED_DATA_BP (20*32+ 0) /* "" AMD No Nested Data Breakpoints */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC (20*32+ 2) /* "" LFENCE always serializing / synchronizes RDTSC */
Hmm, a synthetic bit which gets replaced with a vendor one and then the other
vendors set it too. I don't see why that cannot work but we probably should be
careful here.
dhansen, am I missing an angle?
Also, X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC gets set in init_amd() along with setting
DE_CFG[1]. I think you should check the new flag here first and avoid the
setting if that flag is set. Just for good measure - not that it changes
anything but still, it is cheap to do.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 22:46 [PATCH v6 0/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Support AMD Automatic IBRS Kim Phillips
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for cpuid leaf 80000021/EAX (FeatureExt2Eax) Kim Phillips
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] x86/cpu, kvm: " Kim Phillips
2023-01-17 21:25 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu, kvm: Add support for CPUID_80000021_EAX tip-bot2 for Kim Phillips
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Add the NO_NESTED_DATA_BP feature Kim Phillips
2023-01-17 21:25 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Kim Phillips
2023-01-20 1:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] " Sean Christopherson
2023-01-20 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Move the LFENCE_RDTSC / LFENCE always serializing feature Kim Phillips
2023-01-16 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2023-01-16 21:15 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-16 21:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Add the Null Selector Clears Base feature Kim Phillips
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Add the SMM_CTL MSR not present feature Kim Phillips
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] x86/cpu: Support AMD Automatic IBRS Kim Phillips
2023-01-11 22:29 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-10 22:46 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/cpu, kvm: Propagate the AMD Automatic IBRS feature to the guest Kim Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8WTnx/ukvdAEeoe@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox