* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-16 23:57 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-17 3:59 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-01-16 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 1/16/23 08:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-16 23:57 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-01-17 3:59 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-17 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2023-01-17 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-16 23:57 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-17 3:59 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2023-01-17 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
2023-01-17 11:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-01-17 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:50:34 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.89-rc1-g5bcc318cb4cd
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-17 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2023-01-17 11:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-17 14:23 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-01-17 12:41 ` Sudip Mukherjee
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-17 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, llvm
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64,
i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at
include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in
'__builtin_offsetof'
__field_struct(initcall_t, func)
^
include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is
not a compile-time constant
__field_struct(initcall_t, func)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-101-g5bcc318cb4cd/testrun/14189747/suite/build/tests/
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-101-g5bcc318cb4cd/testrun/14189747/suite/build/test/clang-nightly-lkftconfig/log
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.89-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 5bcc318cb4cd6b13569afdfc6d7b5c8c1f408f06
* git describe: v5.15.87-101-g5bcc318cb4cd
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.87-101-g5bcc318cb4cd
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.86-291-g5e4a8f5e829f)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.86-291-g5e4a8f5e829f)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.86-291-g5e4a8f5e829f)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.86-291-g5e4a8f5e829f)
## Test result summary
total: 146655, pass: 122718, fail: 4588, skip: 19036, xfail: 313
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 136 passed, 15 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 44 passed, 5 failed
* i386: 39 total, 30 passed, 9 failed
* mips: 31 total, 29 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed
* riscv: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 13 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 34 passed, 8 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-17 11:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-17 14:23 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-01-17 14:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Chancellor @ 2023-01-17 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, llvm
Hi Naresh,
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> NOTE:
> clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64,
> i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
>
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in
> '__builtin_offsetof'
> __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> ^
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is
> not a compile-time constant
> __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one
reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round
of stable updates.
https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
Hopefully it will be cleared up next round.
Cheers,
Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-17 14:23 ` Nathan Chancellor
@ 2023-01-17 14:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-01-17 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Chancellor
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, llvm
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:23:49AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> >
> > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > NOTE:
> > clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64,
> > i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
> >
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in
> > '__builtin_offsetof'
> > __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> > ^
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is
> > not a compile-time constant
> > __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one
> reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round
> of stable updates.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
>
> Hopefully it will be cleared up next round.
Yes, I will get to them after these are released, I figured it wasn't
that big of a rush...
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-17 11:27 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-17 12:41 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-17 13:19 ` Allen Pais
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2023-01-17 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2662
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2666
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-17 12:41 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2023-01-17 13:19 ` Allen Pais
2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Allen Pais @ 2023-01-17 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.
Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-17 13:19 ` Allen Pais
@ 2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-18 2:55 ` Kelsey Steele
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-18 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 491 pass: 491 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 1:39 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-18 2:55 ` Kelsey Steele
2023-01-18 8:27 ` Ron Economos
2023-01-18 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2023-01-18 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:50:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
No regressions found on WSL x86_64 or WSL arm64
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 2:55 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2023-01-18 8:27 ` Ron Economos
2023-01-18 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2023-01-18 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On 1/16/23 7:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review
2023-01-16 15:50 [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-18 8:27 ` Ron Economos
@ 2023-01-18 18:10 ` Florian Fainelli
9 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-01-18 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 1/16/2023 7:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread