The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] USB: core: Add wireless_status sysfs attribute
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 17:14:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8bJbM0+XcT6MRq9@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9f8b9413c10fcf067658979d16a4f5c7abe69e7.camel@hadess.net>

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:17:23PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> TLDR: new sysfs attribute that makes it possible to leave receivers for
> wireless headsets plugged in. At the USB level, or at the base driver
> level?
> 
> Longer version:
> I started working on implementing support for some wireless headsets
> that use USB receivers to communicate to the headset itself.

Would this also include wireless keyboard/mice recievers?

Why is "wireless" somehow a special attribute that userspace needs to
know about?

> The USB receivers have multiple interfaces, and independent drivers for
> each, as is wont to do for USB devices. There's usually a HID interface
> to do the custom stuff (LEDs, battery status, connection status, etc.)
> and a standard audio class interface.

This probably should be an interface attribute (as Alan points out), as
it's not a device attribute (think about updating the firmware for one
of these, that's on an interface for the reciever you plugged in, not on
the other end of the wireless connection...)

> Those drivers don't know anything about each other, and getting them to
> talk to each other would be rather complicated. Additionally the audio
> interface is still somewhat functional when the headset is
> disconnected.

Those drivers shouldn't know about each other, that's up to userspace to
group and control if needed.  No kernel interactions should be needed.

> In the end, I came up with this new sysfs attribute that would make it
> possible for user-space (PulseAudio or Pipewire) to know whether the
> receiver is plugged in or not.

Again, should be an interface attribute, if at all.

> That allows user-space to not show the battery information for the
> device (rather than 0 percent), not offer the headset as an output, and
> potentially automatically switch to it when the headset is powered on.

Same for a keyboard/mouse, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-17 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 15:17 [RFC] USB: core: Add wireless_status sysfs attribute Bastien Nocera
2023-01-17 16:01 ` Alan Stern
2023-01-17 16:35   ` Bastien Nocera
2023-01-17 16:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2023-01-17 16:36   ` Bastien Nocera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8bJbM0+XcT6MRq9@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox