linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND 1/1] fs/namespace: defer free_mount from namespace_unlock
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 22:09:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8m/ljQUJOefsD6O@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230119211455.498968-2-echanude@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:14:55PM -0500, Eric Chanudet wrote:
> From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
> 
> Use call_rcu to defer releasing the umount'ed or detached filesystem
> when calling namepsace_unlock().
> 
> Calling synchronize_rcu_expedited() has a significant cost on RT kernel
> that default to rcupdate.rcu_normal_after_boot=1.
> 
> For example, on a 6.2-rt1 kernel:
> perf stat -r 10 --null --pre 'mount -t tmpfs tmpfs mnt' -- umount mnt
>            0.07464 +- 0.00396 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  5.31% )
> 
> With this change applied:
> perf stat -r 10 --null --pre 'mount -t tmpfs tmpfs mnt' -- umount mnt
>         0.00162604 +- 0.00000637 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.39% )
> 
> Waiting for the grace period before completing the syscall does not seem
> mandatory. The struct mount umount'ed are queued up for release in a
> separate list and no longer accessible to following syscalls.

Again, NAK.  If a filesystem is expected to be shut down by umount(2),
userland expects it to have been already shut down by the time the
syscall returns.

It's not just visibility in namespace; it's "can I pull the disk out?".
Or "can the shutdown get to taking the network down?", for that matter.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-19 21:14 [RFC PATCH RESEND 0/1] fs/namespace: defer free_mount from namespace_unlock Eric Chanudet
2023-01-19 21:14 ` [RFC PATCH RESEND 1/1] " Eric Chanudet
2023-01-19 22:09   ` Al Viro [this message]
2023-01-20  8:43     ` Alexander Larsson
2023-01-30  2:57   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8m/ljQUJOefsD6O@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexl@redhat.com \
    --cc=echanude@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).