public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] iommu: Clean up open-coded ownership checks
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:31:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8mahcvlGlHNlh6q@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47109befd7a32d03bffe54192bf02f8c8a223858.1673978700.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:18:25PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
> index 270c3d9128ba..b2d3d309be1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/qcom_iommu.c
> @@ -79,16 +79,6 @@ static struct qcom_iommu_domain *to_qcom_iommu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
>  
>  static const struct iommu_ops qcom_iommu_ops;
>  
> -static struct qcom_iommu_dev * to_iommu(struct device *dev)
> -{
> -	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> -
> -	if (!fwspec || fwspec->ops != &qcom_iommu_ops)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> -}
> -
>  static struct qcom_iommu_ctx * to_ctx(struct qcom_iommu_domain *d, unsigned asid)
>  {
>  	struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu = d->iommu;
> @@ -361,7 +351,7 @@ static void qcom_iommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>  
>  static int qcom_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu = to_iommu(dev);
> +	struct qcom_iommu_dev *qcom_iommu = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>  	struct qcom_iommu_domain *qcom_domain = to_qcom_iommu_domain(domain);
>  	int ret;

The confusing checks for null qcom_iommu following this should go away
too, right?

It should not be possible to have an ops set on the device but have an
invalid priv..

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-19 19:18 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from " Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 13:13   ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-26 14:21     ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 14:41       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-27 13:50         ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-27 13:59           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-27 15:19           ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-27 15:43             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-28  8:49               ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-30 13:49                 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 13:53                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 14:22                     ` Oded Gabbay
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu: Validate that devices match domains Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu: Factor out a "first device in group" helper Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-19 19:36     ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu: Switch __iommu_domain_alloc() to device ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-19 20:12     ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Don't register fwnode for legacy binding Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-20  0:27   ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-20 12:31     ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 12:37       ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-20 10:23   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu: Clean up open-coded ownership checks Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-19 20:52     ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu: Pass device through ops->domain_alloc Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-20 12:33 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8mahcvlGlHNlh6q@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox