From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: Improve return type handling in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages()
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:48:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y91JAb0kKBYQjO8a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203094230.266952-3-thuth@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023, Thomas Huth wrote:
> kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages() tries to return a "unsigned long" value,
> but its caller only stores ther return value in an "int" - which is also
> what all the other kvm_vm_ioctl_*() functions are returning. So returning
> values that do not fit into a 32-bit integer anymore does not work here.
> It's better to adjust the return type, add a sanity check and return an
> error instead if the value is too big.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index da4bbd043a7b..caa2541833dd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6007,8 +6007,11 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_nr_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static unsigned long kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> + if (kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages > INT_MAX)
> + return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> return kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages;
> }
My vote is to skip this patch, skip deprecation, and go straight to deleting
KVM_GET_NR_MMU_PAGES. The ioctl() has never worked[*], and none of the VMMs I
checked use it (QEMU, Google's internal VMM, kvmtool, CrosVM).
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YpZu6%2Fk+8EydfBKf@google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 9:42 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Standardize on "int" return types instead of "long" Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: Standardize on "int" return types instead of "long" in kvm_main.c Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: x86: Improve return type handling in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_nr_mmu_pages() Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 17:48 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-02-07 9:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-07 16:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: Move KVM_GET_NR_MMU_PAGES into the deprecation section Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 10:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-02-03 10:54 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: PPC: Standardize on "int" return types in the powerpc KVM code Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 10:21 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: s390: Use "int" as return type for kvm_s390_get/set_skeys() Thomas Huth
2023-02-07 15:36 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: arm64: Change return type of kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags() to "int" Thomas Huth
2023-02-07 0:09 ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-07 10:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-07 22:16 ` Gavin Shan
2023-02-08 8:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-08 11:51 ` Steven Price
2023-02-08 12:16 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 9:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: Change return type of kvm_arch_vm_ioctl() " Thomas Huth
2023-02-08 17:35 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y91JAb0kKBYQjO8a@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox