From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from bus ops
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 09:59:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9PYppHmuSVSqQ62@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6b55688-1390-4e92-8184-770154a8955d@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:50:29PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2023/1/26 22:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:21:29PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > > The "check" is inherent in the fact that it's been called at all. VFIO
> > > noiommu*is* an IOMMU driver in the sense that it provides a bare minimum of
> > > IOMMU API functionality (i.e. creating groups), sufficient to support
> > > (careful) usage by VFIO drivers. There would not seem to be a legitimate
> > > reason for some*other* driver to be specifically querying a device while it
> > > is already bound to a VFIO driver (and thus may have a noiommu group).
> > Yes, the devices that VFIO assigns to its internal groups never leak
> > outside VFIO's control during their assignment - ie they are
> > continuously bound to VFIO never another driver.
> >
> > So no other driver can ever see the internal groups unless it is
> > messing around with devices it is not bound to 😄
>
> Fair enough. I was thinking that probably we could make it like below:
>
> /**
> * device_iommu_mapped - Returns true when the device DMA is translated
> * by an IOMMU
> * @dev: Device to perform the check on
> */
> static inline bool device_iommu_mapped(struct device *dev)
> {
> return (dev->iommu && dev->iommu->iommu_dev);
> }
>
> The iommu probe device code guarantees that dev->iommu->iommu_dev is
> valid only after the IOMMU driver's .probe_device returned successfully.
>
> Any thoughts?
I find the above much clearer if it can work
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 19:18 [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu: Decouple iommu_present() from " Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 13:13 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-26 14:21 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-27 13:50 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-27 13:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-27 15:19 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-27 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-28 8:49 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-30 13:49 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-30 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 14:22 ` Oded Gabbay
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/8] iommu: Validate that devices match domains Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu: Factor out a "first device in group" helper Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-19 19:36 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu: Switch __iommu_domain_alloc() to device ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-19 20:12 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Don't register fwnode for legacy binding Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu: Retire bus ops Robin Murphy
2023-01-20 0:27 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-20 12:31 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-26 12:37 ` Baolu Lu
2023-01-20 10:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu: Clean up open-coded ownership checks Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-19 20:52 ` Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu: Pass device through ops->domain_alloc Robin Murphy
2023-01-19 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/8] iommu: The early demise of bus ops Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-20 12:33 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9PYppHmuSVSqQ62@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox