From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommufd: Add top-level bounds check on kernel buffer size
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:47:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RwpuVyEi2SBmdQ@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127223816.never.413-kees@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:38:17PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> While the op->size assignments are already bounds-checked at static
> initializer time, these limits aren't aggregated and tracked when doing
> later variable range checking under -Warray-bounds. Help the compiler
> see that we know what we're talking about, and we'll never ask to
> write more that sizeof(ucmd.cmd) bytes during the memset() inside
> copy_struct_from_user(). Seen under GCC 13:
>
> In function 'copy_struct_from_user',
> inlined from 'iommufd_fops_ioctl' at ../drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:333:8:
> ../include/linux/fortify-string.h:59:33: warning: '__builtin_memset' offset [57, 4294967294] is out of the bounds [0, 56] of object 'buf' with type 'union ucmd_buffer' [-Warray-bounds=]
> 59 | #define __underlying_memset __builtin_memset
This seems strange to me
I thought the way gcc handled this was if it knew the value must be in
a certain range then it would check it
If it couldn't figure out any ranges it would not make a warning.
So why did it decide "rest" was in that really weird range?
Is this just a compiler bug?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-28 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 22:38 [PATCH] iommufd: Add top-level bounds check on kernel buffer size Kees Cook
2023-01-28 0:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-28 0:57 ` Kees Cook
2023-01-28 1:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-01 1:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9RwpuVyEi2SBmdQ@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox