public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommufd: Add top-level bounds check on kernel buffer size
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:47:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RwpuVyEi2SBmdQ@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127223816.never.413-kees@kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:38:17PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> While the op->size assignments are already bounds-checked at static
> initializer time, these limits aren't aggregated and tracked when doing
> later variable range checking under -Warray-bounds. Help the compiler
> see that we know what we're talking about, and we'll never ask to
> write more that sizeof(ucmd.cmd) bytes during the memset() inside
> copy_struct_from_user(). Seen under GCC 13:
> 
> In function 'copy_struct_from_user',
>     inlined from 'iommufd_fops_ioctl' at ../drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c:333:8:
> ../include/linux/fortify-string.h:59:33: warning: '__builtin_memset' offset [57, 4294967294] is out of the bounds [0, 56] of object 'buf' with type 'union ucmd_buffer' [-Warray-bounds=]
>    59 | #define __underlying_memset     __builtin_memset

This seems strange to me

I thought the way gcc handled this was if it knew the value must be in
a certain range then it would check it

If it couldn't figure out any ranges it would not make a warning.

So why did it decide "rest" was in that really weird range?

Is this just a compiler bug?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-28  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27 22:38 [PATCH] iommufd: Add top-level bounds check on kernel buffer size Kees Cook
2023-01-28  0:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-28  0:57   ` Kees Cook
2023-01-28  1:13     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-01  1:01       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9RwpuVyEi2SBmdQ@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox