[PATCH 17/35] Documentation: locking: correct spelling

Randy Dunlap
2023-01-27T06:41:33Z

Correct spelling problems for Documentation/locking/ as reported
by codespell.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
---
Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ the validator will shoot a splat if inco
A lock-class's behavior is constructed by its instances collectively:
when the first instance of a lock-class is used after bootup the class
gets registered, then all (subsequent) instances will be mapped to the
-class and hence their usages and dependecies will contribute to those of
+class and hence their usages and dependencies will contribute to those of
the class. A lock-class does not go away when a lock instance does, but
it can be removed if the memory space of the lock class (static or
dynamic) is reclaimed, this happens for example when a module is
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ exact case is for the lock as of the rep
+--------------+-------------+--------------+

The character '-' suggests irq is disabled because if otherwise the
-charactor '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
+character '?' would have been shown instead. Similar deduction can be
applied for '+' too.

Unused locks (e.g., mutexes) cannot be part of the cause of an error.
diff -- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktorture.rst
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ stutter
without pausing.

shuffle_interval
- The number of seconds to keep the test threads affinitied
+ The number of seconds to keep the test threads affined
to a particular subset of the CPUs, defaults to 3 seconds.
Used in conjunction with test_no_idle_hz.

diff -- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ caveats also apply to bit spinlocks.
Some bit spinlocks are replaced with regular spinlock_t for PREEMPT_RT
using conditional (#ifdef'ed) code changes at the usage site. In contrast,
usage-site changes are not needed for the spinlock_t substitution.
-Instead, conditionals in header files and the core locking implemementation
+Instead, conditionals in header files and the core locking implementation
enable the compiler to do the substitution transparently.

diff -- a/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst b/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
--- a/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/preempt-locking.rst
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ critical variables. Another example::

int buf[NR_CPUS];
set_cpu_val(buf);
- if (buf[smp_processor_id()] == -1) printf(KERN_INFO "wee!\n");
+ if (buf[smp_processor_id()] == -1) printf(KERN_INFO "whee!\n");
spin_lock(&buf_lock);
/* ... */