Re: [PATCH 30/35] Documentation: tools/rtla: correct spelling

Steven Rostedt
2023-01-27T19:57:32Z

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 22:40:00 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:

> Correct spelling problems for Documentation/tools/rtla/ as reported
> by codespell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> ---

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve

> Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> --- a/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/tools/rtla/rtla-timerlat-top.rst
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ and then when the *timerlat* thread was
> then be used as the starting point of a more fine-grained analysis.
>
> Note that **rtla timerlat** was dispatched without changing *timerlat* tracer
> -threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads hava
> +threads' priority. That is generally not needed because these threads have
> priority *FIFO:95* by default, which is a common priority used by real-time
> kernel developers to analyze scheduling delays.
>