From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, like.xu.linux@gmail.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:30:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9f+nDdnk8fHXRZe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f70ea782-c7d4-0997-88e0-c24768fd02a9@intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>
> On 1/28/2023 6:13 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > > Arch LBR MSRs are xsave-supported, but they're operated as "independent"
> > > xsave feature by PMU code, i.e., during thread/process context switch,
> > > the MSRs are saved/restored with perf_event_task_sched_{in|out} instead
> > > of generic kernel fpu switch code, i.e.,save_fpregs_to_fpstate() and
> > > restore_fpregs_from_fpstate(). When vcpu guest/host fpu state swap happens,
> > > Arch LBR MSRs are retained so they can be accessed directly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> > > index b57944d5e7d8..241128972776 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> > > @@ -410,6 +410,11 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > > msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL);
> > > }
> > > return 0;
> > > + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_FROM_0 ... MSR_ARCH_LBR_FROM_0 + 31:
> > > + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_TO_0 ... MSR_ARCH_LBR_TO_0 + 31:
> > > + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_INFO_0 ... MSR_ARCH_LBR_INFO_0 + 31:
> > > + rdmsrl(msr_info->index, msr_info->data);
> > I don't see how this is correct. As called out in patch 5:
> >
> > : If for some magical reason it's safe to access arch LBR MSRs without disabling
> > : IRQs and confirming perf event ownership, I want to see a very detailed changelog
> > : explaining exactly how that magic works.
>
> The MSR lists here are just for live migration. When arch-lbr is active,
> these MSRs are passed through to guest.
None of that explains how the guest's MSR values are guaranteed to be resident
in hardware.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 4:05 [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 10:57 ` Like Xu
2022-12-22 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-12-22 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-23 2:12 ` Like Xu
2022-12-27 11:58 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Like Xu
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2023-01-26 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 6:33 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: PMU: disable LBR handling if architectural LBR is available Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 8:10 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:00 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:30 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:15 ` Like Xu
2023-01-27 20:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 11:46 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:09 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:27 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:19 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:16 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:24 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:08 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: VMX: Support passthrough of architectural LBRs Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:27 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:37 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:06 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:28 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:13 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Disable Arch LBREn bit in #DB and warm reset Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:22 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:12 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:09 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Save/Restore guest Arch LBR Ctrl msr at SMM entry/exit Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:50 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:46 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-30 17:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-01-31 13:14 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-31 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:03 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:31 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-12 1:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:38 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-06-05 9:50 ` Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9f+nDdnk8fHXRZe@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox