From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF492C05027 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 15:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231903AbjBBPV7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:21:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38278 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231614AbjBBPV5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Feb 2023 10:21:57 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3101F9 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 07:21:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1675351316; x=1706887316; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1kEcAzPLOKaxZWVbf7kW5ahp0Gw7z2mqgYwUrD3H4nc=; b=O9EIBsNqVrKJCHp8sxVCNRjcOiR6ZKpP0XKMenl1/XEy/2o4i0Hukb2R 8dW7GuReaDhpdGNlDR6upF1claHwyS7K3gzIfNVnDHJCjvssgHQSc/pZW bfufokvX1iQ1cRvef0BmrmGd9B6f2vdn4FKcUFO74EeMJgZtdEjajWhpZ ktCpmr5xqqy20paJIXJ4loB9jqKc07JT2H1QjbD+LPBJF4mtiQHSWvfKo o+jBfUlnl7SWxeT/HRxoV2jhE9vXXFIWL1fd8hMZ6U6JQ1PwqabM+9k5G P7xrq8S7j7Cw8MUCDb8c5cKIMx2+/RqN3YvtMhm2pXTFGFeSQcODpoEVL w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="308810036" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,267,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="308810036" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Feb 2023 07:21:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10608"; a="658765879" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,267,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="658765879" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2023 07:21:54 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pNbPM-001EOG-2F; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 17:21:52 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 17:21:52 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniele Ceraolo Spurio , Alexander Usyskin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomas Winkler , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mei: Move uuid_le_cmp() to its only user Message-ID: References: <20230202145412.87569-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20230202151759.GA28861@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230202151759.GA28861@lst.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:17:59PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 04:54:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > There is only a single user of uuid_le_cmp() API, let's make it private > > to that user. > > Any reason this code can't just use guid_t and guid_equal? It's part of ABI, while guid_* are for the internal use. Eventually they may switch to the internal types, but it's up to MEI. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko