From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
Yair Podemsky <ypodemsk@redhat.com>, P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer.c: update per-CPU bh_lru cache via RCU
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 23:04:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9xrm25NlbEReI7n@tpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9w+b1MJ10uPDROI@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 10:51:27PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:36:53AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:01:47PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > umount calls invalidate_bh_lrus which IPIs each
> >
> > via invalidate_bdev(). So this is only triggered on unmount of
> > filesystems that use the block device mapping directly, right?
While executing:
mount -o loop alpine-standard-3.17.1-x86_64.iso /mnt/loop/
mount-170027 [004] ...1 53852.213367: invalidate_bdev <-__invalidate_device
mount-170027 [004] ...1 53852.213468: invalidate_bdev <-bdev_disk_changed.part.0
mount-170027 [000] ...1 53852.222326: invalidate_bh_lrus <-set_blocksize
mount-170027 [000] ...1 53852.222398: invalidate_bh_lrus <-set_blocksize
systemd-udevd-170031 [011] ...1 53852.239794: invalidate_bh_lrus <-blkdev_flush_mapping
systemd-udevd-170029 [004] ...1 53852.240947: invalidate_bh_lrus <-blkdev_flush_mapping
> >
> > Or is the problem that userspace is polling the block device (e.g.
> > udisks, blkid, etc) whilst the filesystem is mounted and populating
> > the block device mapping with cached pages so invalidate_bdev()
> > always does work even when the filesystem doesn't actually use the
> > bdev mapping?
> >
> > > CPU that has non empty per-CPU buffer_head cache:
> > >
> > > on_each_cpu_cond(has_bh_in_lru, invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1);
> > >
> > > This interrupts CPUs which might be executing code sensitive
> > > to interferences.
> > >
> > > To avoid the IPI, free the per-CPU caches remotely via RCU.
> > > Two bh_lrus structures for each CPU are allocated: one is being
> > > used (assigned to per-CPU bh_lru pointer), and the other is
> > > being freed (or idle).
> >
> > Rather than adding more complexity to the legacy bufferhead code,
> > wouldn't it be better to switch the block device mapping to use
> > iomap+folios and get rid of the use of bufferheads altogether?
>
> Pretty sure ext4's journalling relies on the blockdev using
> buffer_heads. At least, I did a conversion of blockdev to use
> mpage_readahead() and ext4 stopped working.
And its actually pretty simple: the new invalidate_bh_lrus should be
straightforward use of RCU:
1. for_each_online(cpu)
cpu->bh_lrup = bh_lrus[1] (or 0)
2. synchronize_rcu_expedited() (wait for all previous users of
bh_lrup pointer to stop
referencing it).
3. free bh's in bh_lrus[0] (or 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 16:01 [PATCH v3] fs/buffer.c: update per-CPU bh_lru cache via RCU Marcelo Tosatti
2023-02-02 22:36 ` Dave Chinner
2023-02-02 22:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-03 2:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2023-02-03 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9xrm25NlbEReI7n@tpad \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ypodemsk@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox