From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B954C433DB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E7822210 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2393559AbhAZRxI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:53:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51292 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390312AbhAZIoV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 03:44:21 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BA172065C; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:43:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1611650611; bh=RGOC6SXuU+lbMn+ZX7UyoYXvwogc/UEwlnkWFIn9f4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kSaoX74K2eXtrwg/yJ3X5QKORA14j5cvZVrspdE6ewg1AztLk/aKSJObGLezpIOZ9 YlVsAUHn4DWkubCNTFePyiKQDPKYpjh2qvBkkB91KoEQ8I2TEkBbLTr4CnOjfgYH1V Bq2Z/q9wxKQVVJh9cz3L4i1y7HFuOcIZP90q8mE4= Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:43:29 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, pavel@denx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.11-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210125183216.245315437@linuxfoundation.org> <20210125201806.GA78651@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210125201806.GA78651@roeck-us.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:18:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:36:03PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > > On 1/25/21 12:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.11 release. > > > There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:31:44 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.11-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Sanity results from Linaro’s test farm. > > Regressions detected. > > > [ ... ] > > > > Errors look like the following: > > > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' > > /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: In function 'bsp_init_amd': > > /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:572:3: error: '__max_die_per_package' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'topology_max_die_per_package'? > > 572 | __max_die_per_package = nodes_per_socket = ((ecx >> 8) & 7) + 1; > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > | topology_max_die_per_package > > > > Will find out more soon. > > > > This may be due to commit 76e2fc63ca40 ("x86/cpu/amd: Set __max_die_per_package > on AMD"). > > Our patches robot tells me: > > SHA 76e2fc63ca40 recursively fixed by: 1eb8f690bcb5 > > I don't see commit 1eb8f690bcb5 ("x86/topology: Make __max_die_per_package > available unconditionally") in the commit log. I have not checked, > but it is at least possible that applying it fixes the problem. Argh, the one time I don't run my "are there any fixes for the patches in the queue" script, and this pops up... Thanks for this, turns out there's another patch missing as well. I'll be doing a -rc2 soon for two queues... thanks, greg k-h