public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpu/hotplug: CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU exception in fail injection
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:30:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAhoxQxFmcEH3Pin@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210120151723.GA284273@e120877-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 03:17:24PM +0000, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:58:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 05:10:45PM +0000, vincent.donnefort@arm.com wrote:

> > > +	if (cpuhp_is_atomic_state(fail) ||
> > > +	    (fail == CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU && st->state > CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU))
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > Should we instead disallow failing any state that has .cant_stop ?
> 
> We would reduce the scope of what can be tested: bringup_cpu() and
> takedown_cpu() are both marked as "cant_stop". Still, those callbacks are
> allowed to fail.

Fair enough. I suppose we can add an additional cant_fail field, but I'm
not sure that's worth the effort over this.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 17:10 [PATCH 0/4] cpu/hotplug: rollback and "fail" interface fixes vincent.donnefort
2021-01-11 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpu/hotplug: Allowing to reset fail injection vincent.donnefort
2021-01-11 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpu/hotplug: CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU exception in " vincent.donnefort
2021-01-20 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-20 15:17     ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-01-20 17:30       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-01-11 17:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpu/hotplug: Add cpuhp_invoke_callback_range() vincent.donnefort
2021-01-20 13:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-20 17:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-20 17:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-20 17:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-21 10:57       ` Vincent Donnefort
2021-01-21 11:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-20 17:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpu/hotplug: Fix CPU down rollback vincent.donnefort
2021-01-21 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-21 15:43     ` Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YAhoxQxFmcEH3Pin@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox