From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, x86@kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 15:13:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YB1SdvRbHMY7IRrY@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202102051148.WIj5O4Ry-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/asm]
> [also build test WARNING on tip/master linus/master tip/x86/core v5.11-rc6 next-20210125]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 5c99720b28381bb400d4f546734c34ddaf608761
> config: x86_64-randconfig-r026-20210204 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059
> git checkout d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_reenlightenment()+0x7f: undefined stack state
> --
> >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_callback()+0x7f: undefined stack state
> >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_hyperv_stimer0()+0x7f: undefined stack state
It would help if you'd actually applied the patches to a tree that had
the required objtool patches as described in 0/n. Or better yet, don't
scrape emails if the 0/n includes a git link which you'll run on anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 20:49 [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 12:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 02/12] x86/irq: Sanitize irq stack tracking Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 03/12] x86/irq/64: Adjust the per CPU irq stack pointer by 8 Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 15:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 04/12] x86/apic: Split out spurious handling code Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 05/12] x86/irq: Provide macro for inlining irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 20:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 15:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 16:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 18:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 3:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-02-07 8:15 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-08 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 8:57 ` Rong Chen
2021-02-09 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 07/12] x86/entry: Convert device interrupts to inline stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 08/12] x86/entry: Use run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() for XEN upcall Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 7:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 09/12] x86/softirq: Remove indirection in do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 10/12] x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 10:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-02-05 11:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 12/12] x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 21:47 ` [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YB1SdvRbHMY7IRrY@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox