From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpiolib: Bind gpio_device to a driver to enable fw_devlink=on by default
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:22:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YBF3MVttE1aTfx7o@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122193600.1415639-1-saravanak@google.com>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:35:59AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> There are multiple instances of GPIO device tree nodes of the form:
>
> foo {
> compatible = "acme,foo";
> ...
>
> gpio0: gpio0@xxxxxxxx {
> compatible = "acme,bar";
> ...
> gpio-controller;
> };
>
> gpio1: gpio1@xxxxxxxx {
> compatible = "acme,bar";
> ...
> gpio-controller;
> };
>
> ...
> }
>
> bazz {
> my-gpios = <&gpio0 ...>;
> }
>
> Case 1: The driver for "foo" populates struct device for these gpio*
> nodes and then probes them using a driver that binds with "acme,bar".
> This driver for "acme,bar" then registers the gpio* nodes with gpiolib.
> This lines up with how DT nodes with the "compatible" property are
> typically converted to struct devices and then registered with driver
> core to probe them. This also allows the gpio* devices to hook into all
> the driver core capabilities like runtime PM, probe deferral,
> suspend/resume ordering, device links, etc.
>
> Case 2: The driver for "foo" doesn't populate struct devices for these
> gpio* nodes before registering them with gpiolib. Instead it just loops
> through its child nodes and directly registers the gpio* nodes with
> gpiolib.
>
> Drivers that follow case 2 cause problems with fw_devlink=on. This is
> because fw_devlink will prevent bazz from probing until there's a struct
> device that has gpio0 as its fwnode (because bazz lists gpio0 as a GPIO
> supplier). Once the struct device is available, fw_devlink will create a
> device link with gpio0 device as the supplier and bazz device as the
> consumer. After this point, since the gpio0 device will never bind to a
> driver, the device link will prevent bazz device from ever probing.
>
> Finding and refactoring all the instances of drivers that follow case 2
> will cause a lot of code churn and it is not something that can be done
> in one shot. In some instances it might not even be possible to refactor
> them cleanly. Examples of such instances are [1] [2].
>
> This patch works around this problem and avoids all the code churn by
> simply setting the fwnode of the gpio_device and creating a stub driver
> to bind to the gpio_device. This allows all the consumers to continue
> probing when the driver follows case 2.
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201014191235.7f71fcb4@xhacker.debian/
> [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e28e1f38d87c12a3c714a6573beba6e1@kernel.org/
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
As this commit is in my driver-core git tree, can I just take this in
the same tree? Can I get an ack from the maintainer for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 19:35 [PATCH v5] gpiolib: Bind gpio_device to a driver to enable fw_devlink=on by default Saravana Kannan
2021-01-23 22:52 ` Linus Walleij
2021-01-24 2:53 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-01-24 22:48 ` Linus Walleij
2021-01-26 8:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
[not found] ` <CAHp75VfKiuVd7JO-0nwCuvy7tgPZScOpKX8Q4+oT+JSBR+d=ew@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-26 18:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Saravana Kannan
2021-01-26 18:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-27 14:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-01-27 14:31 ` [PATCH v5] " Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-01-27 15:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-30 17:39 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-01-31 21:28 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-01 16:49 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-02-01 20:15 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-02-01 21:15 ` Dmitry Osipenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YBF3MVttE1aTfx7o@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox