From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38DCC433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C498F64E5F for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234790AbhBQSUI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:20:08 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:37910 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233681AbhBQST7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:19:59 -0500 IronPort-SDR: jMU7FshkCpeS+1HMGQy9XiTXIPhdEpvnBOy2ZEahUUeb/SNJvgdl0fDyT0aIo+Q+S3pOJlYQQO GMtKVStS1mRw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9898"; a="180717010" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,185,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="180717010" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2021 10:19:01 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 10/4LOWbbDnZydEs+vFTlUYsXzTSAzQnuDjBVxyDtp4FHP9x+tcj8xiNBV49xXOPLYOR6BMZ3y Q5hA4fy5S5Tw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,185,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="401386165" Received: from gfreude-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.209.147.126]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2021 10:19:00 -0800 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:18:58 -0500 From: Rodrigo Vivi To: Lyude Paul Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , open list , "open list:DRM DRIVERS" , Tejas Upadhyay Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915/icp+: Use icp_hpd_irq_setup() instead of spt_hpd_irq_setup() Message-ID: References: <20210217025337.1929015-1-lyude@redhat.com> <20210217025337.1929015-2-lyude@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210217025337.1929015-2-lyude@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:53:37PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > While reviewing patches for handling workarounds related to gen9 bc, Imre > from Intel discovered that we're using spt_hpd_irq_setup() on ICP+ PCHs > despite it being almost the same as icp_hpd_irq_setup(). Since we need to > be calling icp_hpd_irq_setup() to ensure that CML-S/TGP platforms function > correctly anyway, let's move platforms using PCH_ICP which aren't handled > by gen11_hpd_irq_setup() over to icp_hpd_irq_setup(). > > Cc: Tejas Upadhyay > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul makes sense to me... Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > index f86b147f588f..7ec61187a315 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c > @@ -4320,6 +4320,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup; > else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) > dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup; > + else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP) > + dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = icp_hpd_irq_setup; > else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT) > dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup; > else > -- > 2.29.2 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel