From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
amistry@google.com,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
zhangjinhao2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Fix continue profiling after draining the buffer
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:20:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YC5ptbU8Mavb1a/t@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YB0h9Gj5lpcuqndo@krava>
Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:46:12AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 07:35:22PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:50 PM Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > commit da231338ec9c098707c8a1e4d8a50e2400e2fe17 uses eventfd to solve rare race
> > > where the setting and checking of 'done' which add done_fd to pollfd.
> > > When draining buffer, revents of done_fd is 0 and evlist__filter_pollfd
> > > function returns a non-zero value.
> > > As a result, perf record does not stop profiling.
> > >
> > > The following simple scenarios can trigger this condition:
> > >
> > > sleep 10 &
> > > perf record -p $!
> > >
> > > After the sleep process exits, perf record should stop profiling and exit.
> > > However, perf record keeps running.
> > >
> > > If pollfd revents contains only POLLERR or POLLHUP,
> > > perf record indicates that buffer is draining and need to stop profiling.
> > > Use fdarray_flag__nonfilterable to set done eventfd to nonfilterable objects,
> > > so that evlist__filter_pollfd does not filter and check done eventfd.
> > >
> > > Fixes: da231338ec9c (perf record: Use an eventfd to wakeup when done)
> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
> > > tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > index fd3911650612..51e593e896ea 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > > @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
> > > status = -1;
> > > goto out_delete_session;
> > > }
> > > - err = evlist__add_pollfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
> > > + err = evlist__add_wakeup_eventfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
> > > if (err < 0) {
> > > pr_err("Failed to add wakeup eventfd to poll list\n");
> > > status = err;
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > index 05363a7247c4..fea4c1e8010d 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> > > @@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ int evlist__filter_pollfd(struct evlist *evlist, short revents_and_mask)
> > > return perf_evlist__filter_pollfd(&evlist->core, revents_and_mask);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> > > +int evlist__add_wakeup_eventfd(struct evlist *evlist, int fd)
> > > +{
> > > + return perf_evlist__add_pollfd(&evlist->core, fd, NULL, POLLIN,
> > > + fdarray_flag__nonfilterable);
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Does it build when HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT is not defined?
>
> yea, I was wondering the same.. but it's called only from
> code within HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT ifdef
Yes, this can't work on systems without eventfd, it will simply not
build, and why do we have to make the definition of this function
conditional on HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT?
I'm missing something :-\
Yeah, this whole call to evlist__add_pollfd is already surrounded by
#ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT:
1656 if (zstd_init(&session->zstd_data, rec->opts.comp_level) < 0) {
1657 pr_err("Compression initialization failed.\n");
1658 return -1;
1659 }
1660 #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
1661 done_fd = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
1662 if (done_fd < 0) {
1663 pr_err("Failed to create wakeup eventfd, error: %m\n");
1664 status = -1;
1665 goto out_delete_session;
1666 }
1667 err = evlist__add_pollfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
1668 if (err < 0) {
1669 pr_err("Failed to add wakeup eventfd to poll list\n");
1670 status = err;
1671 goto out_delete_session;
1672 }
1673 #endif // HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
1674
1675 session->header.env.comp_type = PERF_COMP_ZSTD;
1676 session->header.env.comp_level = rec->opts.comp_level;
Jiri, does your Acked-by stands? Namhyung?
- Arnaldo
> jirka
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Namhyung
> >
> >
> > > +
> > > int evlist__poll(struct evlist *evlist, int timeout)
> > > {
> > > return perf_evlist__poll(&evlist->core, timeout);
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> > > index 1aae75895dea..6d4d62151bc8 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
> > > @@ -142,6 +142,10 @@ struct evsel *evlist__find_tracepoint_by_name(struct evlist *evlist, const char
> > > int evlist__add_pollfd(struct evlist *evlist, int fd);
> > > int evlist__filter_pollfd(struct evlist *evlist, short revents_and_mask);
> > >
> > > +#ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
> > > +int evlist__add_wakeup_eventfd(struct evlist *evlist, int fd);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > int evlist__poll(struct evlist *evlist, int timeout);
> > >
> > > struct evsel *evlist__id2evsel(struct evlist *evlist, u64 id);
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
>
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 6:50 [PATCH] perf record: Fix continue profiling after draining the buffer Yang Jihong
2021-02-05 10:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-05 10:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-02-07 0:56 ` Yang Jihong
2021-02-18 10:18 ` Yang Jihong
2021-02-18 13:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-02-18 17:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-22 1:31 ` Yang Jihong
2021-03-03 16:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-03-04 1:19 ` Yang Jihong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YC5ptbU8Mavb1a/t@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amistry@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangjinhao2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox