From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@arm.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] perf test: Output sub testing result in cs-etm
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:30:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YC7AbM4fPBs7DxVo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210215115944.535986-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Em Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:59:42PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> The "perf test" can be integrated into testing framework, e.g. Linux
> kernel functional testing (LKFT) [1]. We are not satisfied with only
> outputting the summarized result for Arm CoreSight testing but lacking
> more detailed result for sub testing.
>
> This patch set is to output sub testing result in cs-etm. Thus the
> testing framework can extract the detailed info and generates reports
> for which sub cases causes failure.
>
> This patch set is cleanly applied on perf/core branch with:
>
> commit 6db59d357e8e ("perf arm64/s390: Fix printf conversion specifier for IP addresses")
>
> After applied the patches, which is tested on Arm Juno-r2 board with
> option '-v', the output result is shown in below; the introduced sub
> testing result has the format like:
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
> "CoreSight path testing (CPU0 -> tmc_etf0): PASS".
>
>
> # perf test 73 -v
> 73: Check Arm CoreSight trace data recording and synthesized samples:
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 17423
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU0 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU0 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU0 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU0 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU1 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU1 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU1 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU1 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU2 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU2 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU2 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU2 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU3 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU3 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU3 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU3 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU4 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU4 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU4 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU4 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU5 => tmc_etf0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU5 -> tmc_etf0): PASS
> Recording trace (only user mode) with path: CPU5 => tmc_etr0
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight path testing (CPU5 -> tmc_etr0): PASS
> Recording trace with system wide mode
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight system wide testing: PASS
> Recording trace with snapshot mode
> Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
> Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
> CoreSight snapshot testing: PASS
> test child finished with 0
> ---- end ----
> Check Arm CoreSight trace data recording and synthesized samples: Ok
>
> [1] https://lkft.linaro.org/
>
>
> Leo Yan (2):
> perf test: Suppress logs in cs-etm testing
> perf test: Output the sub testing result in cs-etm
>
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh | 45 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-18 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-15 11:59 [PATCH v1 0/2] perf test: Output sub testing result in cs-etm Leo Yan
2021-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] perf test: Suppress logs in cs-etm testing Leo Yan
2021-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] perf test: Output the sub testing result in cs-etm Leo Yan
2021-02-18 19:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YC7AbM4fPBs7DxVo@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=Basil.Eljuse@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox