From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B4AC433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBBA64E76 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235448AbhBJCc7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:32:59 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:59242 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235262AbhBJCLQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:11:16 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l9exa-005E2H-M6; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 03:10:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 03:10:30 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Michael Walle Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: phy: icplus: add PHY counter for IP101G Message-ID: References: <20210209164051.18156-1-michael@walle.cc> <20210209164051.18156-9-michael@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210209164051.18156-9-michael@walle.cc> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:40:50PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > The IP101G provides three counters: RX packets, CRC errors and symbol > errors. The error counters can be configured to clear automatically on > read. Unfortunately, this isn't true for the RX packet counter. Because > of this and because the RX packet counter is more likely to overflow, > than the error counters implement only support for the error counters. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew