From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE8AC433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B3D64F9F for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232303AbhCJPah (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:30:37 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50064 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232408AbhCJPae (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:30:34 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA67964F95; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1615390234; bh=bLPrYJC1BcpB13zDjdG1OkrEvZsw6ZD+RF8inzAoyb0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rS8nxjbC7V0QP/QlY8hu9UamkqcjcKZOGcI+RsvFq4L2b4qyKIKKJcxnLlNcK6Gko 5dmG9WbzRb02cpPpTZ2uedXsKUb05mmuGEctHq8yBU8f1mKBziEgeIJ6yEPGk48OGz dxGh1qNy+on5/Og3UmM9cw3HPmU8xk1OfbZciEEn3XJRnySKSkaED2UFp8U4Ig+JHM 7FYrxP1GcFm9MKimBYFTEx4ny7DxCXbjdn+CaBqQpJKvtdWIAx5vMVQopPmFepNawX mdvEYGD2Toy8bC19dhfF0w2Y3eSUaWE9vINBAafpTzDxdluVJhtgAYLTs3ct/J4Uuq T81Lv7/KORdwQ== Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:30:09 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Dave Hansen Cc: Haitao Huang , Borislav Petkov , Kai Huang , kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, luto@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features Message-ID: References: <20210301100037.GA6699@zn.tnic> <3fce1dd2abd42597bde7ae9496bde7b9596b2797.camel@intel.com> <20210301103043.GB6699@zn.tnic> <7603ef673997b6674f785d333a4f263c749d2cf3.camel@intel.com> <20210301105346.GC6699@zn.tnic> <20210301113257.GD6699@zn.tnic> <0adc41774945bf9d6e6a72a93b83c80aa8c59544.camel@intel.com> <22f8a4be-b0ec-dfc5-cf05-a2586ce7557c@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22f8a4be-b0ec-dfc5-cf05-a2586ce7557c@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:58:37AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 3/2/21 7:48 AM, Haitao Huang wrote: > > > > Hi Haitao, Jarkko, > > > > Do you have more concrete use case of needing "sgx2" in /proc/cpuinfo? > > Kai, please remove it from your series. I'm not hearing any arguments > remotely close enough to what Boris would require in order to keep it. Agreed. /Jarkko