From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12303C433E6 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD54E64FB3 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231466AbhCLOtc (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:49:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37618 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231557AbhCLOtU (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:49:20 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 081A864FB3; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:49:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1615560560; bh=cT289FKV3xsUZY63Dur1xgCbw90X01pELCM4fumbr9g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tyaTRgv+DMJOZFnymtjHoYQMgk2pX6AO8NSQY0vdION0nZOr8cyRC749jvLp05w0x xTABbuDrQBLOgyhsEyu9iKwvDd7D0V+lqMELqd245tPlB7Pp71BOpFp40B3DBHK1Mh fd6EI/z2R348qL8yYtJz51CSlLXj5OVIL8crAgkE= Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:49:18 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Daeho Jeong Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com, Daeho Jeong Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] f2fs: add sysfs nodes to get runtime compression stat Message-ID: References: <20210312122531.2717093-1-daeho43@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:42:04PM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote: > So, do you want we protect the values here with spin_lock and just > read without spin_lock in sysfs read part? I would not use any lock at all if this were my code. Remember, this is for debugging/information only, right? And the data is always "stale" so what is it going to be used for? thanks, greg k-h