From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F40C433DB for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC75D61933 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230105AbhCSPXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:23:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49376 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230113AbhCSPXX (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:23:23 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE4E66192B; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:23:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616167403; bh=Ist7TXJDo//jARL87z+7k11JeR1R03Sp1atlXSKAzgk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Wlnbysv+K5E3KxSUNkRMFEEFt8SS7kxaiVPNRn0J1Ie/VMX8/XJZiOvbwHiK22aZd NOEr3N7Yn86TbPcV6kANYjxfhZZG1US7k1tplItE6aPf/aGsApjnbZUjWAUm9hXVws b1nf5NarQwtZfZwhlptBOJ07EQj4jCl4V/3YQnq34SoKOraL5wsVpN1DFIlxh//k1o 7c9KuSvrBkUCrHkA/5lLOU8tNe2tTxdZ1Ql4j0wHeoA/jrikVogHKg+uhvd2yiG6af GfLSK7dKy9sXV3JgkgCw88ddFRmwFBbWjPdiM1LhQBTcZ2Kw5lZxc/S7OqB+JTQVZf L4IeeBUTrO4zQ== Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:22:56 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Kai Huang , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Avoid returning NULL in __sgx_alloc_epc_page() Message-ID: References: <20210319040602.178558-1-kai.huang@intel.com> <20210319084523.GA6251@zn.tnic> <20210319220141.8bf20c54fdb06c6f93cde448@intel.com> <20210319145931.GH6251@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210319145931.GH6251@zn.tnic> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:59:31PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:50:33PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > I was on the verge whether to merge that into the original patch since > > > > it is the top patch on the branch or create a new one but opted for > > > > former because this way it won't break bisection and people won't have > > > > to pay attention whether there's a fix patch to the NUMA patch too, in > > > > case they wanna backport and whatnot. > > ... > > > I understood Boris' comment that the fixes would not be squashed. > > Please read it again and let me know what about it is not clear. It is > at the beginning of this mail. I did misread it for the first time. So let's sanity: you *are* going to squash the patches together because that way it's factors easier to backport the whole thing? Is this the correct understanding? Fair point, I can cope with that. > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > /Jarkko