From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Allison Collins <allison.henderson@oracle.com>,
Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix return of uninitialized value in variable error
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:28:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHBkjihVv4+7D62Q@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409141834.667163-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:18:34PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> A previous commit removed a call to xfs_attr3_leaf_read that
> assigned an error return code to variable error. We now have
> a few early error return paths to label 'out' that return
> error if error is set; however error now is uninitialized
> so potentially garbage is being returned. Fix this by setting
> error to zero to restore the original behaviour where error
> was zero at the label 'restart'.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: 07120f1abdff ("xfs: Add xfs_has_attr and subroutines")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> index 472b3039eabb..902e5f7e6642 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_attr.c
> @@ -928,6 +928,7 @@ xfs_attr_node_addname(
> * Search to see if name already exists, and get back a pointer
> * to where it should go.
> */
> + error = 0;
> retval = xfs_attr_node_hasname(args, &state);
> if (retval != -ENOATTR && retval != -EEXIST)
> goto out;
I think it would be nicer to initialize at the top of the function as
opposed to try and "preserve" historical behavior, but that nit aside:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 14:18 [PATCH] xfs: fix return of uninitialized value in variable error Colin King
2021-04-09 14:28 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-04-09 14:41 ` Colin Ian King
2021-04-09 17:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHBkjihVv4+7D62Q@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
--cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox