From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] :staging: rtl8723bs: Remove useless led_blink_hdl()
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:06:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHXBdKuEHd1LcxVG@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413155908.8691-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> Removed the led_blink_hdl() function (declaration, definition, and
> caller code) because it's useless. It only seems to check whether or not a
> given pointer is NULL. There are other (simpler) means for that purpose.
But you do not actually do that here. Why not? You just removed
something, does it still work properly with that removal?
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
Why the leading ":" in your subject line?
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 1 -
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 9 ---------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/rtw_mlme_ext.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
Does this patch require some other patch to be applied first?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 15:59 [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] :staging: rtl8723bs: Remove useless led_blink_hdl() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 16:04 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 16:19 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 16:27 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 16:47 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 18:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-13 18:30 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 18:57 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 19:16 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 19:25 ` Julia Lawall
2021-04-13 19:45 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-13 19:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-13 20:08 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 5:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 6:33 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 7:00 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 7:59 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 7:40 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-14 7:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-13 16:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-14 11:52 [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: " Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 12:00 ` Fabio Aiuto
2021-04-14 12:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-04-14 13:27 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-04-14 13:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-04-14 15:36 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHXBdKuEHd1LcxVG@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox