From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Raoul Strackx <raoul.strackx@fortanix.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/sgx: eextend ioctl
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:52:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHbJfXqyhtUb1AKw@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da7ae1e7-59b8-63db-a9f1-607b4e529639@fortanix.com>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:59:56AM +0200, Raoul Strackx wrote:
> Creation of an SGX enclave consists of three steps. First, a new enclave
> environment is created by the ECREATE leaf function. Some enclave settings
> are specified at this step by passing an SGX Enclave Control Structure
> (SECS) that contains the enclave MRENCLAVE, MRSIGNER, etc. This
> instruction also starts a cryptographic log of the enclave being built.
> (This log should eventually result in the MRENCLAVE.) Second, pages are
> added to the enclave. The EADD leaf function copies 4KB data to an empty
> EPC page. The cryptographic log records (among other properties) the
> location and access rights of the page being added. It _does not_ include
> an entry of the page content. When the enclave writer wishes to ensure the
> content of (a part of) the enclave page as well, she must use the EEXTEND
> leaf function. Extending the enclave cryptographic log can only be done
> per 256 bytes. Extending the log with a full 4K page thus requires 16
> invocations of the EEXTEND leaf function. It is however up to the enclave
> developer to decide if and how enclave memory is added to the
> cryptographic log. EEXTEND functions may be issued only for relevant parts
> of an enclave page, may happen only after all pages have been added, and
> so on. Finally, the enclave is finalized by the EINIT leaf function. Any
> new invocations of the EADD or EEXTEND leaf functions will result in a
> fault. With EINIT a number of checks are performed as well. The
> cryptographic hash of the final cryptographic log is compared to the
> MRENCLAVE field of the SECS structure passed to the ECREATE leaf function
> (see step one). The signature (MRSIGNER) over this MRENCLAVE is verified
> as well. When all checks pass, the enclave loading is complete and it
> enters the executable state.
Who do you expect to read this paragraph, seriously?
> The SGX driver currently only supports extending the cryptographic log as
> part of the EADD leaf function and _must_ cover complete 4K pages.
> Enclaves not constructed within these constraints, currently cannot be
> loaded on the Linux platform. Trying to do so will result in a different
> cryptographic log; the MRENCLAVE specified at enclave creation time will
> not match the cryptographic log kept by the processor and EINIT will fail.
> This poses practical problems:
> - The current driver does not fully support all possible SGXv1 enclaves.
> It creates a separation between enclaves that run everywhere and
> enclaves that run everywhere, except on Linux. This includes enclaves
> already in use on other systems today.
> - It limits optimizations loaders are able to perform. For example, by
> only measuring relevant parts of enclave pages, load time can be
> minimized.
>
> This patch set adds a new ioctl to enable userspace to execute EEXTEND
> leaf functions per 256 bytes of enclave memory. With this patch in place,
> Linux will be able to build all valid SGXv1 enclaves.
>
> See additional discussion at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/20200220221038.GA26618@linux.intel.com/
> T/#m93597f53d354201e72e26d93a968f167fcdf5930
>
>
> Raoul Strackx (3):
> x86/sgx: Adding eextend ioctl
> x86/sgx: Fix compatibility issue with OPENSSL < 1.1.0
> x86/sgx: eextend ioctl selftest
>
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h | 11 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/defines.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/load.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/main.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/sigstruct.c | 43 ++++++++---------
> 6 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 8:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/sgx: eextend ioctl Raoul Strackx
2021-04-12 9:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/sgx: Adding " Raoul Strackx
2021-04-12 9:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/sgx: Fix compatibility issue with OPENSSL < 1.1.0 Raoul Strackx
2021-04-12 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/sgx: eextend ioctl selftest Raoul Strackx
2021-04-12 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/sgx: eextend ioctl Dave Hansen
2021-04-12 15:58 ` Jethro Beekman
2021-04-12 16:40 ` Dave Hansen
2021-04-12 16:41 ` Jethro Beekman
2021-04-12 16:47 ` Dave Hansen
2021-04-12 17:01 ` Jethro Beekman
2021-04-14 11:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-04-14 10:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-04-14 11:01 ` Jethro Beekman
2021-04-16 13:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHbJfXqyhtUb1AKw@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=raoul.strackx@fortanix.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox