Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] staging: rtl8192e: rectified spelling mistake and replace memcmp with ether_oui_equal

[Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:55:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:26:01PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > Added a generic function of static inline bool in
> > include/linux/etherdevice.h to replace memcmp with
> > ether_oui_equal throughout the execution.
> > Corrected the misspelled words in this file.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  
> > Changes from v1:- Rectified spelling mistake and replaced memcmp with
> > ether_oui_equal.
> > 
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 48 +++++++++++------------
> >  include/linux/etherdevice.h               |  5 +++
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> This is networking code and not staging code, but the netdev mailing
> list isn't CC'd.
>
I didn't knew mail id then, I will look into this,

> >  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > index ec6b46166e84..ce58feb2af9a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ u16 MCS_DATA_RATE[2][2][77] = {
> >  	 810, 720, 810, 900, 900, 990} }
> >  };
> >  
> > -static u8 UNKNOWN_BORADCOM[3] = {0x00, 0x14, 0xbf};
> > +static u8 UNKNOWN_BROADCOM[3] = {0x00, 0x14, 0xbf};
> 
> Please pull this spelling fix into its own patch.
> 
Okay Sir.

> [ snip ]
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/etherdevice.h b/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> > index 2e5debc0373c..6a1a63168319 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/etherdevice.h
> > @@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ static inline bool is_link_local_ether_addr(const u8 *addr)
> >  #endif
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool ether_oui_equal(const u8 *addr, const u8 *oui)
> > +{
> > +return addr[0] == oui[0] && addr[1] == oui[1] && addr[2] == oui[2];
> > +}
> 
> The indenting is messed up on this.
>
OKay Sir, I am looking into this.

> regards,
> dan carpenter
>