public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:02:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b30e5815-441c-b4d3-85ad-65a4020f6d93@arm.com>

On Thursday 29 Apr 2021 at 14:34:14 (+0200), Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 28/04/2021 19:27, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values
> > for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently
> > computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one
> > error in some configurations.
> > 
> > For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51.2,
> > rounded to the closest value: 51. Now, a task with a clamp of 1024 (as
> > is the default for the min clamp of RT tasks) will be mapped to bucket
> > id 1024/51=20 as we're now using a standard integer division. Sadly,
> > correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound
> > memory access.
> > 
> > Fix this by using a rounding-up division when computing the bucket size.
> 
> But in case you use e.g. 16 buckets, wouldn't you still end up with this
> task mapped into bucket_id=16?
> 
> 1024/16=64
> 
> 1024/64=16

Hrmpf, you're right ...

So I guess the following will do:

    #define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / UCLAMP_BUCKETS + 1)

Thanks,
Quentin

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-29 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-28 17:27 [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp Quentin Perret
2021-04-29 12:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-29 15:02   ` Quentin Perret [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com \
    --to=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox