From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:02:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b30e5815-441c-b4d3-85ad-65a4020f6d93@arm.com>
On Thursday 29 Apr 2021 at 14:34:14 (+0200), Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 28/04/2021 19:27, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values
> > for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently
> > computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one
> > error in some configurations.
> >
> > For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51.2,
> > rounded to the closest value: 51. Now, a task with a clamp of 1024 (as
> > is the default for the min clamp of RT tasks) will be mapped to bucket
> > id 1024/51=20 as we're now using a standard integer division. Sadly,
> > correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound
> > memory access.
> >
> > Fix this by using a rounding-up division when computing the bucket size.
>
> But in case you use e.g. 16 buckets, wouldn't you still end up with this
> task mapped into bucket_id=16?
>
> 1024/16=64
>
> 1024/64=16
Hrmpf, you're right ...
So I guess the following will do:
#define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / UCLAMP_BUCKETS + 1)
Thanks,
Quentin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 17:27 [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp Quentin Perret
2021-04-29 12:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-29 15:02 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox