From: Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix gb_loopback_stats_attrs definition
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 01:10:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ7SFVInaYgJLywS@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88d7da63-d03c-7fa3-a881-aff8e7b4a618@ieee.org>
PS: Thought I should clarify why I think it might help. The macro
definition for gb_loopback_attr, calls other macros, but since these
macros are not in all caps, (I apologise if they follow some other macro
convention that I am not aware about,) it makes them look like function
calls. And I know it were lazy of me to not look at the individual macros
themselves, I think it would be a lot clearer if there was a way of knowing
that these calls are infact to other macros and not functions.
Adding declare_ as a prefix to all of them certainly helps, if only a
little, in that regards. Functions are not used for declaring things,
and since the gb_loopback_attr macro itself would have declare_
prepended to it, it would certainly give a hint to the fact that the
calls used in the definition might similarly be macros.
Once again, I do accept it was my fault that I sent the patch without
looking at those definitions more closely, and not considering that the
developer who wrote it must have had a reason for doing so. I just
wanted to clarify that renaming them might actually help.
Regards,
Shreyansh Chouhan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-14 13:30 [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix gb_loopback_stats_attrs definition Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 13:36 ` Greg KH
2021-05-14 13:48 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 14:05 ` Greg KH
2021-05-14 14:23 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 14:30 ` Greg KH
2021-05-14 15:12 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 15:30 ` Greg KH
2021-05-14 15:34 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 15:56 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-14 16:51 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 18:04 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 18:53 ` Alex Elder
2021-05-14 19:07 ` Shreyansh Chouhan
2021-05-14 19:32 ` Joe Perches
2021-05-14 19:40 ` Shreyansh Chouhan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJ7SFVInaYgJLywS@fedora \
--to=chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com \
--cc=elder@ieee.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox