public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alarmtimer: check RTC features instead of ops
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:34:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJAX60DSp/imRstL@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rasf8qe.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

Hello,

On 30/04/2021 10:59:53+0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 10:10, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 30/04/2021 09:16:40+0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 29 2021 at 23:49, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >> > Test RTC_FEATURE_ALARM instead of relying on ops->set_alarm to know whether
> >> > alarms are available.
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: 7ae41220ef58 ("rtc: introduce features bitfield")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > This doesn't seem much but this solve an issue where following a change in the
> >> > RTC driver, this part of the code will think the RTC is alarm capable while it
> >> > is not, then breaking the alarmtimer functionnality.
> >> 
> >> So a driver has the set_alarm() callback but does not advertise
> >> RTC_FEATURE_ALARM for whatever reason and why ever this makes sense.
> >> 
> >
> > No, it would be the other way around. The issue happens when you have
> > two RTCs, rtc0 is not alarm capable and rtc1 has alarms.
> >
> > The driver for rtc0 used to not have .set_alarm() to signal it didn't
> > support alarms, it then switched to RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, making the
> > alarmtimer code select that RTC instead of rtc1, breaking suspend/resume
> > on the platform.
> 
> I'm even more confused. So RTC0 does not have .set_alarm() but why does
> it turn on RTC_FEATURE_ALARM? I'm obviously misinterpreting the above...
> 

I'm sorry for not being clear.

With RTC0 not having alarms and RTC1 having alarms:

The previous situation was:

The driver for RTC0 didn't have any .set_alarm() to signel it doesn't
support alarms.
On registration, alarmtimer_rtc_add_device finds out it doesn't have the
.set_alarm() callback and doesn't select that RTC.
On registration of RTC1, alarmtimer_rtc_add_device finds .set_alarm()
and RTC1 is now the alarmtimer rtcdev.

The new situation is:

The driver for RTC0 always have .set_alarm() but clears
RTC_FEATURE_ALARM to signal it doesn't support alarms.
On registration, alarmtimer_rtc_add_device finds .set_alarm() and RTC0
is now the alarmtimer rtcdev, leading to an error when rtc_timer_start()
is called.

I hope this is clearer.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-03 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-29 21:49 [PATCH] alarmtimer: check RTC features instead of ops Alexandre Belloni
2021-04-30  7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30  8:10   ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-04-30  8:59     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 15:34       ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2021-05-03 18:00         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-08  0:06           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJAX60DSp/imRstL@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox