public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: imxdi: add wakeup support
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:12:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJE6QhePvy7f4LKW@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210504100858.4i2crnfwchlcopr7@viti.kaiser.cx>

On 04/05/2021 12:08:58+0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Thus wrote Alexandre Belloni (alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com):
> 
> > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, imxdi);
> 
> > > +	device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
> 
> > Maybe it makes sense to simply use device_init_wakeup here.
> 
> the explanation for device_init_wakeup
> 
> "By default, most devices should leave wakeup disabled. The exceptions
> are devices that everyone expects to be wakeup sources: keyboards, power
> buttons, ..."
> 
> made me think that device_set_wakeup_capable is more appropriate here. I
> can change this if you want.
> 

Doesn't everyone expect the RTC to be a wakeup source? :)

> However, if I compile rtc-imxdi as a module and use device_init_wakeup,
> the module can't be unloaded any more. The reason is that alarmtimer
> (kernel/time/alarmtimer.c) starts using rtc-imxdi as its backing rtc
> device and holds a reference to it. It seems that alarmtimer has no way
> to relinquish its backing rtc device, regardless of any pending alarms.
> 
> What is the right approach here? Are there any rtc drivers that act as a
> wakeup source and can still be unloaded if compiled as a module?
> 

Yes, when you don't have alarmtimer ;)
I honestly think the RTC selection needs to be a bit more dynamic but at
the same time, it would not be great to change it at suspend time. I
guess the best way would be to allow module unloading and tracking when
the RTC disappears.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30  9:32 [PATCH] rtc: imxdi: add wakeup support Martin Kaiser
2021-05-01 10:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-05-04 10:08   ` Martin Kaiser
2021-05-04 12:12     ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2021-05-05 16:25       ` Martin Kaiser
2021-05-05 16:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Martin Kaiser
2021-05-05 17:34   ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-05-11 16:12 ` [PATCH v3] " Martin Kaiser
2021-05-24 22:43   ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJE6QhePvy7f4LKW@piout.net \
    --to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox