public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Print out unknown kernel parameters
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 18:50:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJLMxXp2f7YvjGJ9@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505163728.oh7rqpdvxrdilmfk@halaneylaptop>

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:37:28AM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> I actually did use that recommendation essentially, the patch I've sent
> is riding on the work done by unknown_bootoption() which is populated by
> iterating over over the different sections parameters can live in - so
> this is only printing out arguments that didn't match a known kernel
> parameter. Sorry if I didn't make that clear earlier, definitely was
> trying to listen to your advice.

Bah, don't take my "advice" too seriously - I'm just throwing out
guesses. :-)

So ok, unknown_bootoption() handles those and AFAICT, that gets passed
to parse_args() with the __start___param and __stop___param range.

But then there is that do_early_param() thing for early params, which
are different and which are between __setup_start and __setup_end -
i.e., the ones I meant above.

And that function doesn't do the unknown bootoption handling ;-\

More fun.

> I'll have to think about this some more (the "did you mean this
> parameter" part).. that seems like it might be more trouble than it is
> worth, but I admittedly haven't looked into those cheap algorithms you
> mentioned yet. The reason I say it might be more trouble than it is
> worth is because it is easy to say "why didn't my param work", then grep
> for it in dmesg and find it in the "Unknown command line parameters"
> list - that's sort of the workflow I imagined would happen when someone
> mucks with their kernel cli and doesn't get the intended result.

Oh sure - that's what I meant with "cheap". If it can't be done
elegantly and easily, just forget it. dmesg | grep is a lot easier. :-)

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-03 21:34 [PATCH] init: Print out unknown kernel parameters Andrew Halaney
2021-05-03 21:59 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-03 22:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-04 15:00     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-05-04 15:26       ` Andrew Halaney
2021-05-05 14:20         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-05-05 16:37           ` Andrew Halaney
2021-05-05 16:50             ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-05-05 16:55               ` Andrew Halaney
2021-05-05 17:08                 ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJLMxXp2f7YvjGJ9@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox