From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stack: replace "o" output with "r" input constraint
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 14:12:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJMKQFscszFcf5fE@archlinux-ax161> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIIcoz4fHjVjWHTI@archlinux-ax161>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 06:02:27PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 04:17:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> >
> > "o" isn't a common asm() constraint to use; it triggers an assertion in
> > assert-enabled builds of LLVM that it's not recognized when targeting
> > aarch64 (though it appears to fall back to "m"). I've fixed this in LLVM
> > 13 now, but there isn't really a good reason to be using "o" in particular
> > here. To avoid causing build issues for those using assert-enabled builds
> > of earlier LLVM versions, the constraint needs changing.
> >
> > Instead, if the point is to retain the __builtin_alloca(), we can make ptr
> > appear to "escape" via being an input to an empty inline asm block. This
> > is preferable anyways, since otherwise this looks like a dead store.
> >
> > While the use of "r" was considered in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202104011447.2E7F543@keescook/
> > it was only tested as an output (which looks like a dead store, and
> > wasn't sufficient). Use "r" as an input constraint instead, which
> > behaves correctly across compilers and architectures:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/E9cd411ob
> >
> > Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100412
> > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49956
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Fixes: 39218ff4c625 ("stack: Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall")
Kees, were you planning on taking this to Linus or someone else? It
would be nice to have this in for -rc1 (although I understand it might
be too late), if not, by -rc2.
Cheers,
Nathan
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> I built arm64 defconfig with and without
> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT with LLVM 12 (which does not have
> Nick's LLVM fix) without any issues and did a quick boot test in QEMU,
> nothing exploded.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/randomize_kstack.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> > index fd80fab663a9..bebc911161b6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/randomize_kstack.h
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void *__builtin_alloca(size_t size);
> > u32 offset = raw_cpu_read(kstack_offset); \
> > u8 *ptr = __builtin_alloca(KSTACK_OFFSET_MAX(offset)); \
> > /* Keep allocation even after "ptr" loses scope. */ \
> > - asm volatile("" : "=o"(*ptr) :: "memory"); \
> > + asm volatile("" :: "r"(ptr) : "memory"); \
> > } \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 23:17 [PATCH] stack: replace "o" output with "r" input constraint Kees Cook
2021-04-23 1:02 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-05-05 21:12 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-05-05 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2021-05-11 8:02 ` [tip: core/urgent] stack: Replace " tip-bot2 for Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJMKQFscszFcf5fE@archlinux-ax161 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox