public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/i915/display: New function to avoid duplicate code in upcomming commits
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 20:47:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJV9HA5IuQW+KWOf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210507084903.28877-2-wse@tuxedocomputers.com>

On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:49:01AM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote:
> Moves some checks that later will be performed 2 times to an own function.
> This avoids duplicate code later on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> index 46de56af33db..576d3d910d06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
> @@ -1861,6 +1861,31 @@ static int intel_hdmi_port_clock(int clock, int bpc)
>  	return clock * bpc / 8;
>  }
>  
> +static enum drm_mode_status
> +intel_hdmi_mode_clock_valid(struct intel_hdmi *hdmi, int clock, bool has_hdmi_sink)
> +{
> +	struct drm_device *dev = intel_hdmi_to_dev(hdmi);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	enum drm_mode_status status;
> +
> +	/* check if we can do 8bpc */
> +	status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, clock, true, has_hdmi_sink);
> +
> +	if (has_hdmi_sink) {
> +		/* if we can't do 8bpc we may still be able to do 12bpc */
> +		if (status != MODE_OK && !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv))
> +			status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, clock * 3 / 2,

Seems we've lost intel_hdmi_port_clock() here somehow.

> +						       true, has_hdmi_sink);
> +
> +		/* if we can't do 8,12bpc we may still be able to do 10bpc */
> +		if (status != MODE_OK && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> +			status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, clock * 5 / 4,

Also here.

> +						       true, has_hdmi_sink);
> +	}
> +
> +	return status;
> +}
> +
>  static enum drm_mode_status
>  intel_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  		      struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> @@ -1891,21 +1916,7 @@ intel_hdmi_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  	if (drm_mode_is_420_only(&connector->display_info, mode))
>  		clock /= 2;
>  
> -	/* check if we can do 8bpc */
> -	status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 8),
> -				       true, has_hdmi_sink);
> -
> -	if (has_hdmi_sink) {
> -		/* if we can't do 8bpc we may still be able to do 12bpc */
> -		if (status != MODE_OK && !HAS_GMCH(dev_priv))
> -			status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 12),
> -						       true, has_hdmi_sink);
> -
> -		/* if we can't do 8,12bpc we may still be able to do 10bpc */
> -		if (status != MODE_OK && DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> -			status = hdmi_port_clock_valid(hdmi, intel_hdmi_port_clock(clock, 10),
> -						       true, has_hdmi_sink);
> -	}
> +	status = intel_hdmi_mode_clock_valid(hdmi, clock, has_hdmi_sink);
>  	if (status != MODE_OK)
>  		return status;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-07 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 17:23 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/display: Try YCbCr420 color when RGB fails Werner Sembach
2021-05-06 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/display: New function to avoid duplicate code in upcomming commits Werner Sembach
2021-05-06 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/display: Restructure output format computation for better expandability Werner Sembach
2021-05-06 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/display: Use YCbCr420 as fallback when RGB fails Werner Sembach
2021-05-07  8:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] drm/i915/display: Try YCbCr420 color " Werner Sembach
2021-05-07  8:49   ` [PATCH v6 1/3] drm/i915/display: New function to avoid duplicate code in upcomming commits Werner Sembach
2021-05-07 17:47     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-05-07 20:33       ` Werner Sembach
2021-05-07  8:49   ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drm/i915/display: Restructure output format computation for better expandability Werner Sembach
2021-05-07 17:52     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-05-07 17:56       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-07 21:24       ` Werner Sembach
2021-05-07  8:49   ` [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/i915/display: Use YCbCr420 as fallback when RGB fails Werner Sembach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YJV9HA5IuQW+KWOf@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox