From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] selftests/sgx: Migrate to kselftest harness
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 20:48:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKP+CavM21klDHH8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b920525-694c-a8e4-93f5-7b1a3f9ad009@intel.com>
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:03:42AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On 5/12/2021 2:53 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Migrate to kselftest harness. Use a fixture test with enclave initialized
> > and de-initialized for each of the existing three tests, in other words:
> >
> > 1. One FIXTURE() for managing the enclave life-cycle.
> > 2. Three TEST_F()'s, one for each test case.
> >
> > This gives a leaps better reporting than before. Here's an example
> > transcript:
> >
> > TAP version 13
> > 1..3
> >
> > ok 1 enclave.unclobbered_vdso
> >
> > ok 2 enclave.clobbered_vdso
> >
> > ok 3 enclave.clobbered_vdso_and_user_function
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > v5:
> > * Use TH_LOG() for printing enclave address ranges instead of printf(),
> > based on Reinette's remark.
>
> Thank you for considering my feedback. The motivation for my comment was to
> consider how this test output will be parsed. If these tests will have their
> output parsed by automated systems then it needs to conform to the TAP13
> format as supported by kselftest.
>
> In your latest version the output printed during a successful test has been
> changed, using TH_LOG() as you noted. From what I can tell this is the only
> output addressed - failing tests continue to print error messages (perror,
> fprintf) without consideration of how they will be parsed. My apologies, I
> am not a kselftest expert to know what the best way for this integration is.
>
> Reinette
It's a valid question, yes.
The problem is that only main.c can use kselftest macros because
kselftest_harness.h pulls
static int test_harness_run(int __attribute__((unused)) argc,
char __attribute__((unused)) **argv)
which will not end up having a call site (because there's no
"TEST_HARNESS_MAIN").
The whole logging thing in kselftest harness is a bit ambiguous.
Namely:
1. There's a macro TH_LOG() defined in kselftest_harness.h, which
"internally" uses fprintf().
2. There's an inline function ksft_print_msg() in kselftest.h
using vsprintf().
To add to that, kselftest_harness.h internally prints by using
ksft_print_msg(), and provides TH_LOG(), which does not use
ksft_print_msg().
I don't really get the logic in all this.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 21:53 [PATCH v5 1/2] selftests/sgx: Rename 'eenter' and 'sgx_call_vdso' Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-12 21:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] selftests/sgx: Migrate to kselftest harness Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-17 17:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-18 17:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2021-05-18 19:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-05-18 20:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-20 16:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKP+CavM21klDHH8@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox