From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:45:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKfHiu/a/V/0DS3V@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513213732.418398-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:37:32PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> +static int acpi_wakeup_cpu(int apicid, unsigned long start_ip)
> +{
> + u8 timeout = 0xFF;
> +
> + /* Remap mailbox memory only for the first call to acpi_wakeup_cpu() */
> + if (physids_empty(apic_id_wakemap))
> + acpi_mp_wake_mailbox = memremap(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox_paddr,
> + sizeof(*acpi_mp_wake_mailbox),
> + MEMREMAP_WB);
{ } for being multi-line
> + /*
> + * According to the ACPI specification r6.4, sec 5.2.12.19, the
> + * mailbox-based wakeup mechanism cannot be used more than once
> + * for the same CPU, so skip sending wake commands to already
> + * awake CPU.
> + */
> + if (physid_isset(apicid, apic_id_wakemap)) {
> + pr_err("CPU already awake (APIC ID %x), skipping wakeup\n",
> + apicid);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> +
> + /*
> + * Mailbox memory is shared between firmware and OS. Firmware will
> + * listen on mailbox command address, and once it receives the wakeup
> + * command, CPU associated with the given apicid will be booted. So,
> + * the value of apic_id and wakeup_vector has to be set before updating
> + * the wakeup command. So use WRITE_ONCE to let the compiler know about
> + * it and preserve the order of writes.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->apic_id, apicid);
> + WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->wakeup_vector, start_ip);
> + WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command, ACPI_MP_WAKE_COMMAND_WAKEUP);
Do those want to be smp_store_release(), in addition to being a volatile
write, those also include compiler barriers to make sure the compiler
doesn't lift stuff around.
> +
> + /*
> + * After writing wakeup command, wait for maximum timeout of 0xFF
> + * for firmware to reset the command address back zero to indicate
> + * the successful reception of command.
> + * NOTE: 255 as timeout value is decided based on our experiments.
> + *
> + * XXX: Change the timeout once ACPI specification comes up with
> + * standard maximum timeout value.
> + */
> + while (READ_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command) && timeout--)
> + cpu_relax();
What's the unit of the timeout? The mailbox reads, the PAUSE
instruction?
> +
> + if (timeout) {
> + /*
> + * If the CPU wakeup process is successful, store the
> + * status in apic_id_wakemap to prevent re-wakeup
> + * requests.
> + */
> + physid_set(apicid, apic_id_wakemap);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* If timed out (timeout == 0), return error */
> + return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> #endif /*CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-26 2:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-26 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPICA: ACPI 6.4: MADT: add Multiprocessor Wakeup Mailbox Structure Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-26 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI/table: Print MADT Wake table information Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-26 2:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-10 16:32 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-10 16:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-10 17:10 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-10 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2021-05-10 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-10 21:15 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-11 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-13 21:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-21 14:18 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-21 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-05-21 15:14 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-24 6:02 ` [PATCH v5 " Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-24 6:40 ` Mika Penttilä
2021-05-24 13:42 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-24 14:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-05-24 15:35 ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-05-10 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKfHiu/a/V/0DS3V@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox