public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Move probing cgroup sampling support
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:30:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLY2cdeQec5bH5Jc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210527182835.1634339-1-namhyung@kernel.org>

Em Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:28:35AM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> I found that checking cgroup sampling support using the missing
> features doesn't work on old kernels.  Because it added both
> attr.cgroup bit and PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP bit, it needs to check
> whichever comes first (usually the actual event, not dummy).
> 
> But it only checks the attr.cgroup bit which is set only in the dummy
> event so cannot detect failtures due the sample bits.  Also we don't
> ignore the missing feature and retry, it'd be better checking it with
> the API probing logic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c      |  6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c          |  6 +-----
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h          |  1 -
>  tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.h |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c
> index 829af17a0867..020411682a3c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ static void perf_probe_build_id(struct evsel *evsel)
>  	evsel->core.attr.build_id = 1;
>  }
>  
> +static void perf_probe_cgroup(struct evsel *evsel)
> +{
> +	evsel->core.attr.cgroup = 1;
> +}
> +
>  bool perf_can_sample_identifier(void)
>  {
>  	return perf_probe_api(perf_probe_sample_identifier);
> @@ -182,3 +187,8 @@ bool perf_can_record_build_id(void)
>  {
>  	return perf_probe_api(perf_probe_build_id);
>  }
> +
> +bool perf_can_record_cgroup(void)
> +{
> +	return perf_probe_api(perf_probe_cgroup);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.h
> index f12ca55f509a..b104168efb15 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_api_probe.h
> @@ -12,5 +12,6 @@ bool perf_can_record_switch_events(void);
>  bool perf_can_record_text_poke_events(void);
>  bool perf_can_sample_identifier(void);
>  bool perf_can_record_build_id(void);
> +bool perf_can_record_cgroup(void);
>  
>  #endif // __PERF_API_PROBE_H
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index bc3dd379eb67..71efe6573ee7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -2733,6 +2733,12 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  		rec->no_buildid = true;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (rec->opts.record_cgroup && !perf_can_record_cgroup()) {
> +		pr_err("Kernel has no cgroup sampling support.\n");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_opts;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (rec->opts.kcore)
>  		rec->data.is_dir = true;
>  

The above is perf/urgent material and should fix your issue, right?

The part below is a separate patch and can be left for later, or maybe
remain in the codebase, as simple tools that use just one evsel and
request a cgroup will continue probing the kernel, etc. I.e. it
shouldn't get in the way for cases with dummies, etc.

Simple tools then won't have to get that !perf_can_record_cgroup() call.

- Arnaldo

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 4a3cd1b5bb33..2462584d0ee5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ void evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
>  		attr->namespaces  = track;
>  
>  	if (opts->record_cgroup) {
> -		attr->cgroup = track && !perf_missing_features.cgroup;
> +		attr->cgroup = track;
>  		evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, CGROUP);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1933,10 +1933,6 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
>  		perf_missing_features.data_page_size = true;
>  		pr_debug2_peo("Kernel has no PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE support, bailing out\n");
>  		goto out_close;
> -	} else if (!perf_missing_features.cgroup && evsel->core.attr.cgroup) {
> -		perf_missing_features.cgroup = true;
> -		pr_debug2_peo("Kernel has no cgroup sampling support, bailing out\n");
> -		goto out_close;
>          } else if (!perf_missing_features.branch_hw_idx &&
>  	    (evsel->core.attr.branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX)) {
>  		perf_missing_features.branch_hw_idx = true;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 75cf5dbfe208..fecf13c0e4da 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -168,7 +168,6 @@ struct perf_missing_features {
>  	bool bpf;
>  	bool aux_output;
>  	bool branch_hw_idx;
> -	bool cgroup;
>  	bool data_page_size;
>  	bool code_page_size;
>  	bool weight_struct;
> -- 
> 2.32.0.rc0.204.g9fa02ecfa5-goog
> 

-- 

- Arnaldo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-01 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27 18:28 [PATCH] perf tools: Move probing cgroup sampling support Namhyung Kim
2021-05-30 22:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-06-01 13:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2021-06-01 13:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-06-01 22:46     ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YLY2cdeQec5bH5Jc@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox