From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/2] RDMA/mlx5: Allow modifying Relaxed Ordering via fast registration
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 15:16:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLd2i7LnWurwLWUs@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526194906.GA3646419@nvidia.com>
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:49:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:13:36PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Relaxed Ordering is enabled by default for kernel ULPs, and is set
> > during MKey creation, yet it cannot be modified by them afterwards.
> >
> > Allow modifying Relaxed Ordering via fast registration work request.
> > This is done by setting the relevant flags in the MKey context mask and
> > the Relaxed Ordering flags in the MKey context itself.
> >
> > Only ConnectX-7 supports modifying Relaxed Ordering via fast
> > registration, and HCA capabilities indicate it. These capabilities are
> > checked, and if a fast registration work request tries to modify Relaxed
> > Ordering and the capabilities are not present, the work request will fail.
>
>
> > @@ -762,23 +786,33 @@ static void set_sig_mkey_segment(struct mlx5_mkey_seg *seg,
> > seg->len = cpu_to_be64(length);
> > seg->xlt_oct_size = cpu_to_be32(get_xlt_octo(size));
> > seg->bsfs_octo_size = cpu_to_be32(MLX5_MKEY_BSF_OCTO_SIZE);
> > +
> > + if (!(access_flags & IB_ACCESS_DISABLE_RELAXED_ORDERING)) {
> > + MLX5_SET(mkc, seg, relaxed_ordering_write,
> > + MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_write_umr));
> > + MLX5_SET(mkc, seg, relaxed_ordering_read,
> > + MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_read_umr));
> > + }
> > }
>
> I don't quite get this patch
This is premature optimization. We don't really need it.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 10:13 [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/2] Enable relaxed ordering for ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-20 10:13 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 1/2] RDMA: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-27 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-28 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-20 10:13 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/2] RDMA/mlx5: Allow modifying Relaxed Ordering via fast registration Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-26 19:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-02 12:16 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-05-26 19:30 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/2] Enable relaxed ordering for ULPs Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-27 8:11 ` David Laight
2021-05-31 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-31 21:45 ` David Laight
2021-05-31 22:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLd2i7LnWurwLWUs@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox