From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C97C48BE6 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFA361278 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230396AbhFLByO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:54:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229622AbhFLByN (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jun 2021 21:54:13 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B38C061574; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lrsoM-007AAA-Sv; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:46 +0000 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 01:51:46 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Ian Kent Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , Eric Sandeen , Fox Chen , Brice Goglin , Rick Lindsley , David Howells , Miklos Szeredi , Marcelo Tosatti , "Eric W. Biederman" , Carlos Maiolino , linux-fsdevel , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] kernfs: use VFS negative dentry caching Message-ID: References: <162322846765.361452.17051755721944717990.stgit@web.messagingengine.com> <162322862726.361452.10114120072438540655.stgit@web.messagingengine.com> <2ee74cbed729d66a38a5c7de9c4608d02fb89f26.camel@themaw.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 09:08:05AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > But if I change to take the read lock to ensure there's no operation > in progress for the revision check I would need the dget_parent(), yes? WTF for? ->d_parent can change *ONLY* when ->d_lock is held on all dentries involved (including old and new parents). And it very definitely does *not* change for negative dentries. I mean, look at the very beginning of __d_move().