From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC6DC49360 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766A46124B for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232277AbhFNAU1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:20:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40416 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232208AbhFNAU0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 20:20:26 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3DDC061574; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=QT899P7cnZ+OavoKwMjdK7EHSjBMVrz89zrq8vC4muU=; b=FVTM/S6kVb8n2Xu/KQzgMF6Wcy TMnTODUE3+WxGnow6MVXu9GH0At649lNh6N7iOTpGLTjvv/dy/HgZzZBrNkipxWR7+koSq6fI+Kww azH3cc4mk2pjj0K4Cqj5xaWj/NxVFAQGzO5KdHlqlgMAgEsg9EG2uev325UQcn8esarGdH6P2AUNs U522fjJR2OWCeVbo8gGuUmKks3vFCrXKtxEA8OW4VH13fdNky93iYkJOu1dHG2k/jgpPOEWfbOle2 C0H9je3pIzuGExInNQtvDeSjNX7RmJqVVicrL2qKqMwyaYxxXTu8btAz3yeKvfbaMjFmXVB8YoCzk Af+0lcRw==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lsaIm-004u8i-J2; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:18:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:18:04 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Hu Haowen , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: add traditional Chinese translation for kernel Documentation Message-ID: References: <20210607132414.44601-1-src.res@email.cn> <4ecfaca0-801b-1827-2d6a-13690e016957@email.cn> <87wnqxbcjb.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87wnqxbcjb.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 04:55:04PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Hu Haowen writes: > > 在 2021/6/7 下午9:24, Hu Haowen 写道: > >> Add traditional Chinese translation (zh_TW) for the Linux Kernel > >> documentation with a series of translated files. > > > > Is this patch applied? I have another amount of changes on this, so > > please handle it as soon as possible. > > I have been away from the keyboard for the last week, and haven't had a > chance to look at it yet. That will happen soon. Meanwhile, please be > patient; it has not yet even been a week since you posted this work. > > Taking a quick look, there are a couple of things you can do: > > - We have a Chinese translation, now you are creating a different one. > Please explain why that is needed? I think this explains it: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4892372/language-codes-for-simplified-chinese-and-traditional-chinese So if we would consider having (eg) fr_FR and fr_CA, it's reasonable to have both zh_CN and zh_TW. No, I'm not volunteering to produce en_GB (or is that en_UK?)