Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: correct the description error for check_redundant()

[Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:05:23PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>
> 
> If there is no matched result, check_redundant() will return BFS_RNOMATCH.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@gmail.com>

Good catch!

Nit: you may want to capitalize the first letter after subsystem tag in
the patch title, like:

	"locking/lockdep: Correct ..."

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Regards,
Boqun

> ---
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index cfe0f4374594..1f126ca7fbd7 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2726,7 +2726,7 @@ static inline bool usage_skip(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask)
>   * <target> or not. If it can, <src> -> <target> dependency is already
>   * in the graph.
>   *
> - * Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
> + * Return BFS_RMATCH if it does, or BFS_RNOMATCH if it does not, return BFS_E* if
>   * any error appears in the bfs search.
>   */
>  static noinline enum bfs_result
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>