From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F411DC2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5AB61864 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230112AbhFYRpS (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:45:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44684 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229531AbhFYRpR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:45:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A788DC061574 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id k30-20020a05600c1c9eb02901d4d33c5ca0so913623wms.3 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:42:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=philpotter-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YMKlpyW2/43uGs0P+FeoGQBHis6+kuFUJ6JvmkPAJ3o=; b=mhbhFBVtJK8c62GyU0FDJF3kT0tkdzRiSz4OQc3ivIJwjNs1dTjdwJY5SfrglAeK/3 IFI/bGZyYtHNgyTOlSJbazLIh57Q+o++NUgDya2rfNh5awdjxOfruXfTVJRLP57wLRVE FvaeW9fApr706cuJgHeRzJ7ulLFWwRLo8/IEOszOWLqDXjyDoS/H9YLytGseNX8HmauK 7tDB4ptEHvD9gh9rvcZ0ljIEFAWfQtSJgKf77CWFVDC2uQmSI3Y5OUz477Awn5g69Shh ovotEqtJd+sFJ6N1Fp+5ics2evGvuqb5kYfVCtnFxPPgOqDSPXVchj2PgDVKWl1IIRI0 2TSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=YMKlpyW2/43uGs0P+FeoGQBHis6+kuFUJ6JvmkPAJ3o=; b=RgLeaewUS0UonogmzRlE756LESTWN7niAmO6oZ1jZDiTBHiqFpVlJI46D/1OFPX9+V Fpa/VrB7BSsccn2a2uOZng4b3LEfFzBDB6SZbwRdXLPx+Cj+vf/HM51YOSKv2H6PHb/G evvEV93/zEv9YDGHtt+r0BoVzLHScOPYWPgBSmqB+CbyKB8rm/PtlVAuUFTJANmmbEV4 03PztU/oxXg7+vhDFpCjVO/VW1yqPgxTJNjepXhXfTgsKsUDg6RubB5q6k9BthBKyvBJ m90PKzeu0VHc2vaIjT5K888DtifLs/8QNA9WrLW5Bn9vkgj/8inSU0hADG8F1VAMKp+n YJCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xDCb9woxh0TY7lhpKYC+iO82hptgMaRxEMvjrdBdgcXzILKk4 h12bXiPZjBGxPGZlBpS/NoS9wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlx4jibs6+pOrr95H3d7IW3Zr4NwfvBbIbbQ1V7v+31jKYDz7J2v5RqJAfYxc+ZEb4XQAe6A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9d55:: with SMTP id g82mr11911094wme.152.1624642975305; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from equinox (2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.1.e.e.d.f.d.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:dfde:e1a0::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm6449973wri.91.2021.06.25.10.42.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 18:42:52 +0100 From: Phillip Potter To: Dan Carpenter Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] staging: rtl8188eu: remove include/rtw_debug.h Message-ID: References: <20210625000756.6313-1-phil@philpotter.co.uk> <20210625124356.GJ2040@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210625124356.GJ2040@kadam> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:43:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Looks good. > > I feel like the kbuild warnings could be addressed in later patches. > > It seems as if some of the error handling in this driver is "pretend to > print an error message (but it's actually dead code)". Which is > probably not the correct way to handle errors... :/ But that's not > something introduced by this patch. > > Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter > > regards, > dan carpenter > Dear Dan, Thank you for your feedback, and have a great weekend. Regards, Phil