From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:06:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNyIYNpcy2WsnUnu@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxi6pMEehkXWAk=vzx3mZAfcxwVPvFs9W7LM2CfgBkZWxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:56:34PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 4:44 PM Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while using the
> > copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file. Before commit
> > 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") the
> > kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to copy a file across
> > different filesystems. After this commit, the syscall doesn't fail anymore
> > and instead returns zero (zero bytes copied), as this file's content is
> > generated on-the-fly and thus reports a size of zero.
> >
> > This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that existed
> > prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across
> > devices"). Filesystems are still allowed to fall-back to the VFS
> > generic_copy_file_range() implementation, but that has now to be done
> > explicitly.
> >
> > nfsd is also modified to fall-back into generic_copy_file_range() in case
> > vfs_copy_file_range() fails with -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV.
> >
> > Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx+BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/
> > Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> > ---
> > Changes since v9
> > - the early return from the syscall when len is zero now checks if the
> > filesystem is implemented, returning -EOPNOTSUPP if it is not and 0
> > otherwise. Issue reported by test robot.
>
> What issue was reported?
Here's the link to my previous email:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/877dk1zibo.fsf@suse.de/
... which reminds me that I need to also send a patch to fix the fstest.
(Although the test as-is actually allowed to find this bug...)
Cheers,
--
Luís
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 13:44 [PATCH v10] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Luis Henriques
2021-06-30 14:56 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-30 15:06 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2021-06-30 15:38 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNyIYNpcy2WsnUnu@suse.de \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox