public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v8 13/13] x86/kprobes: Fixup return address in generic trampoline handler
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:34:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOLEMvR1bCQiIMcl@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162400004562.506599.7549585083316952768.stgit@devnote2>


* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> In x86, kretprobe trampoline address on the stack frame will
> be replaced with the real return address after returning from
> trampoline_handler. Before fixing the return address, the real
> return address can be found in the current->kretprobe_instances.
> 
> However, since there is a window between updating the
> current->kretprobe_instances and fixing the address on the stack,
> if an interrupt caused at that timing and the interrupt handler
> does stacktrace, it may fail to unwind because it can not get
> the correct return address from current->kretprobe_instances.
> 
> This will minimize that window by fixing the return address
> right before updating current->kretprobe_instances.

Is there still a window? I.e. is it "minimized" (to how big of a window?), 
or eliminated?

> +void arch_kretprobe_fixup_return(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				 unsigned long correct_ret_addr)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *frame_pointer;
> +
> +	frame_pointer = ((unsigned long *)&regs->sp) + 1;
> +
> +	/* Replace fake return address with real one. */
> +	*frame_pointer = correct_ret_addr;

Firstly, why does &regs->sp have to be forced to 'unsigned long *'? 

pt_regs::sp is 'unsigned long' on both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels AFAICS.

Secondly, the new code modified by your patch now looks like this:

        frame_pointer = ((unsigned long *)&regs->sp) + 1;
 
+       kretprobe_trampoline_handler(regs, frame_pointer);

where:

+void arch_kretprobe_fixup_return(struct pt_regs *regs,
+                                unsigned long correct_ret_addr)
+{
+       unsigned long *frame_pointer;
+
+       frame_pointer = ((unsigned long *)&regs->sp) + 1;
+
+       /* Replace fake return address with real one. */
+       *frame_pointer = correct_ret_addr;
+}

So we first do:

        frame_pointer = ((unsigned long *)&regs->sp) + 1;

... and pass that in to arch_kretprobe_fixup_return() as 
'correct_ret_addr', which does:

+       frame_pointer = ((unsigned long *)&regs->sp) + 1;
+	*frame_pointer = correct_ret_addr;

... which looks like the exact same thing as:

	*frame_pointer = frame_pointer;

... obfuscated through a thick layer of type casts?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-05  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18  7:05 [PATCH -tip v8 00/13] kprobes: Fix stacktrace with kretprobes on x86 Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v8 01/13] ia64: kprobes: Fix to pass correct trampoline address to the handler Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  7:46   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-05 10:05     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v8 02/13] kprobes: treewide: Replace arch_deref_entry_point() with dereference_symbol_descriptor() Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  7:48   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-05 12:03     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-07 18:28   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-07-08  4:08     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v8 03/13] kprobes: treewide: Remove trampoline_address from kretprobe_trampoline_handler() Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  7:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-05 10:03     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  7:49   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-06-18  7:05 ` [PATCH -tip v8 04/13] kprobes: Add kretprobe_find_ret_addr() for searching return address Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  7:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-05 14:11     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 05/13] x86/kprobes: Add UNWIND_HINT_FUNC on kretprobe_trampoline code Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  8:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-09 15:31     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-10  1:41       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-10 19:01         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-07-10 19:24           ` [PATCH 1/2] objtool: Add frame-pointer-specific function ignore Josh Poimboeuf
2021-07-11  1:16             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-29  2:31             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-10 19:25           ` [PATCH 2/2] objtool: Ignore unwind hints for ignored functions Josh Poimboeuf
2021-07-11  2:07             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 06/13] ARC: Add instruction_pointer_set() API Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 07/13] ia64: " Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 08/13] arm: kprobes: Make a space for regs->ARM_pc at kretprobe_trampoline Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  8:04   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-05 14:40     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 09/13] kprobes: Enable stacktrace from pt_regs in kretprobe handler Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18 14:04   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-06-18  7:06 ` [PATCH -tip v8 10/13] x86/kprobes: Push a fake return address at kretprobe_trampoline Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  8:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-07-09 14:55     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:07 ` [PATCH -tip v8 11/13] x86/unwind: Recover kretprobe trampoline entry Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05 11:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-05 15:42     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-06  7:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-06 15:11         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-07-07  8:20           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-07  8:36             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-07 10:15             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-07 10:20               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-07 10:45                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-07 13:29                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-07 14:42                     ` Matt Wu
2021-07-11 14:09                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-11 15:28                         ` Matt Wu
2021-07-12  4:57                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:07 ` [PATCH -tip v8 12/13] tracing: Show kretprobe unknown indicator only for kretprobe_trampoline Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  7:07 ` [PATCH -tip v8 13/13] x86/kprobes: Fixup return address in generic trampoline handler Masami Hiramatsu
2021-07-05  8:34   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2021-07-06 12:57     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18 17:44 ` [PATCH -tip v8 00/13] kprobes: Fix stacktrace with kretprobes on x86 Andrii Nakryiko
2021-06-28 13:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YOLEMvR1bCQiIMcl@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sagar.abhishek@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox