public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: add guest pvstate support
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 06:53:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOjFWZzgQxjPWaXw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJWu+opFedsq6CdgUYErnxsv3-Pr7MHi0vz9=hhpMCujFPp8+A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Joel,

On (21/07/09 14:58), Joel Fernandes wrote:
[..]
> > +struct vcpu_state {
> > +       bool    preempted;
> > +       u8      reserved[63];
> > +};
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> >  #include <linux/static_call_types.h>
> >
> > @@ -20,8 +25,22 @@ static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
> >
> >  int __init pv_time_init(void);
> >
> > +bool dummy_vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu);
> > +
> > +extern struct static_key pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled;.
> 
> pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled static_key is not used in any patch.
> Maybe it is stale?

Oh, it is, thanks.

> > +DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(pv_vcpu_is_preempted, dummy_vcpu_is_preempted);
> > +
> > +static inline bool paravirt_vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > +       return static_call(pv_vcpu_is_preempted)(cpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int __init pv_vcpu_state_init(void);
> > +
> >  #else
> >
> > +#define pv_vcpu_state_init() do {} while (0)
> > +
> >  #define pv_time_init() do {} while (0)
> >
> >  #endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> > index 75fed4460407..d8fc46795d94 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> > @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ struct pv_time_stolen_time_region {
> >
> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pv_time_stolen_time_region, stolen_time_region);
> >
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_state, vcpus_states);
> > +struct static_key pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled;
> > +
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(pv_vcpu_is_preempted, dummy_vcpu_is_preempted);
> 
> Could we use DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL and get rid of the dummy
> function? I believe that makes the function trampoline as return
> instruction, till it is updated.

Is DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL for cases when function returns void?

We need something that returns `false` to vcpu_is_preempted() or
per_cpu(vcpus_states) once pv vcpu-state is initialised.

[..]
> > +static bool __vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > +       struct vcpu_state *st;
> > +
> > +       st = &per_cpu(vcpus_states, cpu);
> > +       return READ_ONCE(st->preempted);
> 
> I guess you could just do:
> {
>   return READ_ONCE(per_cpu(vcpus_states, cpu).preempted);
> }

Ack.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-09 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-09  4:37 [PATCHv2 0/4] arm64:kvm: teach guest sched that VCPUs can be preempted Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] arm64: smccc: Add SMCCC pv-vcpu-state function call IDs Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: add guest pvstate support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  7:39   ` David Edmondson
2021-07-09  7:52     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 18:58   ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-09 21:53     ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-07-11 16:58       ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-12 15:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  2:05     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21  8:22       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  8:47         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 10:16           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] arm64: do not use dummy vcpu_is_preempted() Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 15:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  2:06     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: add host pv-vcpu-state support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 16:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 18:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-21  8:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 10:38         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 11:08           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  1:15     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21  9:10       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YOjFWZzgQxjPWaXw@google.com \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox