From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFB7C1B08C for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE0D6128D for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235771AbhGOOLn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:11:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229620AbhGOOLn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:11:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AFBBC06175F for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id o3-20020a17090a6783b0290173ce472b8aso6339171pjj.2 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=53qxuoU8eppRM5jkQ4Kk+jPNk3lJWcHi5u+XjEfD+pc=; b=ZTICTx9k3uv0754iy1fraBKdvHUdUWqFmJ+cE1gb88CsJOVkzbC4GkXqB6hkDd2aS8 M/hivmpaeFOLjVtk7grKV56LsAlnxkICFVN4HAoePXJuDrYVQscR5tAZO3IcaitL6UlT d74IpB6j+D+hlAu+tg152h2YjWneYcVztYXjQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=53qxuoU8eppRM5jkQ4Kk+jPNk3lJWcHi5u+XjEfD+pc=; b=AVKxooCXrnXFSjfXvmVO+sKyradSToaJyChSzcgsiB7VvOyHD2ho1DyH5ODpwYc934 4xpYCc/NpKztGqqpfrPjV/SumCA5gPIk9Oy4wtfNVtRL/xuZXWkGI1C4hgHR/nHJdd3x +7prYyovAXGGRFdwFFoNiSusxjoDySMDYrxO9LXnUIQi0hZeqbguKlIzW5rGcuWr4aMv dqezd+kojC7Rvg+YgpLC5ougStmzXKrUvLbcGzhUevG58gd0iwi46T2eNlRwqRaYTU// gNm5LmKcabMFdV4Npt8iTmj0FvCnAvpsszZUb5U9scGl7cgj5RlUgqG22Zo9gKa9gY9I QAWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cF0/dAXOtJZ3ccdILPQRhABeBqPhRQnLIVDE7Z1zb4jmogaEk hwxUXMrBJTG9dRxDsAjpFWpblQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr4orhN8EsxOujAU/gk+BQElZ62i0IgfexfrRqK76o00qh7gVKE32yOIUtHWnteORcM6O8ug== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc44:b029:12b:415:57bf with SMTP id t4-20020a170902bc44b029012b041557bfmr3534211plz.33.1626358129676; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2409:10:2e40:5100:cf9:3b54:4709:3747]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm6977225pfm.156.2021.07.15.07.08.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 23:08:41 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] rcu/tree: handle VM stoppage in stall detection Message-ID: References: <20210521155624.174524-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <20210715133241.GJ4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210715133241.GJ4397@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (21/07/15 06:32), Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > Hello Paul, > > > > I've noticed that this patch set didn't make it to Linus's tree. > > Was it intentional? > > This patch (and the 18 preceding it) didn't make the cutoff for the > just-past merge window. Oh, I see. > If this patch is urgent, please let me know > and I can push it, with luck by the end of next week. > > If that one is urgent, are these two also? No, Paul, nothing is urgent. Many thanks for the detailed clarifications.