From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72480C12002 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5171360C41 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239783AbhGPNNB (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:13:01 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:63157 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238560AbhGPNM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:12:59 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10046"; a="274553797" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,245,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="274553797" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2021 06:10:03 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,245,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="413974663" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2021 06:09:59 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4NbE-00EEct-3X; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:09:52 +0300 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:09:52 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Robin Murphy Cc: kernel test robot , Heiko Stuebner , Elaine Zhang , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] clk: fractional-divider: Export approximation algo to the CCF users Message-ID: References: <20210715120752.29174-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <202107152356.7gQSC0vc-lkp@intel.com> <9e1c1fde-fbbc-69d4-9273-192844037cd8@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9e1c1fde-fbbc-69d4-9273-192844037cd8@arm.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 06:58:40PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2021-07-15 17:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 7:49 PM kernel test robot wrote: > > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > Definitely! > > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > > > > > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c:27:10: fatal error: clk-fractional-divider.h: No such file or directory > > > 27 | #include "clk-fractional-divider.h" > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > compilation terminated. > > > > Indeed. No idea how to compile-test this on x86. > > Let me see what I can do to avoid other issues. > > Ha, the individual SoC-specific parts have COMPILE_TEST support, but the > top-level COMMON_CLK_ROCKCHIP doesn't. That could probably be fixed. > > Otherwise, you can always grab a toolchain from [1] (if your distro doesn't > offer one already) and cross-compile - defconfig for arm64 or > multi_v7_defconfig for arm should cover it. With a hack patch I was able to compile-test. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko