From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58D4C432BE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE98860C3F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235972AbhG1KgP (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:36:15 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45992 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232231AbhG1KgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:36:09 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEC2160F9B; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:36:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1627468567; bh=mviEGy4qjzfn1sZWnEi7AAvBd5mtP0LY/xM21mCMajY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wdU0Gpbbfnm0j30cBFdyzK3L0O4taBxz9XVFuxMypjhmSQDedhwOLnP6GjgnWaoEb i93fg1fyra9wDcOLv4Z7UMxha2SDRqXm1cFdsKePUpRyIyB1gLsW+MJ41m0tFWygNv uTiGietfYCMwd7HaWObBh/fFjX0CkA7brPj9nFLU= Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:36:05 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linux LED Subsystem , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Hans de Goede , Pavel Machek , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: LED subsystem lagging maintenance Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:26:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Hi! > > I have noticed that in the last couple of cycles the LED subsystem is > a bit laggish in terms of maintenance (*). I think it's time that > someone can help Pavel to sort things out. > > In any case, I wonder if we have any kind of procedure for what to do > in such cases. Do we need to assume that the subsystem is in a > (pre-)orphaned state? If so, who is the best to take care of patch > flow? What outstanding patches have not been handled? Have you talked to Pavel about this? > *) e.g. I have a series against a few drivers in LED with actual fixes > and it is missed v5.13 (okay, that time Pavel had comments which I > have addressed at ~rc7 time frame), missed v5.14 and seems on the > curve to miss v5.15. If you address something at -rc7 you should not expect the changes to be merged in time for the next release, what would you do if you were on the other end? > P.S. I Cc'ed lately active, AFAICS, in that area people + Greg for his opinion. I think that Pavel should be the one asking for help here if he needs it. greg k-h